Interact
Interact


Man City

Started by: GOLDEN BEAR (4737) 

Congrat's to city after today's win over Chelsea ,start putting the ribbons on the trophy now ,the season is over !! GB .

Started: 15th Jan 2022 at 15:49

Posted by: Don GB (597)

It's been a good day all round.

Premier League - City 1 Chelsea 0
Premier League 2 - City 3 trafford 0
Premier League U18 - Liverpool 0 City 1
Womens Super League - Villa 0 City 3

The future's bright.....the future's Blue.


Replied: 15th Jan 2022 at 21:51

Posted by: whups (8265) 

until it all comes crumbling down .

Replied: 16th Jan 2022 at 01:29

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

When folk are boasting about the result of their womans teams you know they are playing catch up

Replied: 16th Jan 2022 at 01:41

Posted by: Don GB (597)

still on ignore

Replied: 16th Jan 2022 at 12:06

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

Still peeping at my posts

Replied: 16th Jan 2022 at 12:17

Posted by: Don GB (597)

still on ignore

Replied: 16th Jan 2022 at 12:21

Posted by: whups (8265) 

he cant lie straight in bed chatty .

Replied: 17th Jan 2022 at 11:35

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Well said golden bear,credit where it's due,but I still think Liverpool may have an outside chance!

Replied: 17th Jan 2022 at 14:34

Posted by: Don GB (597)

Hee Hee,

The CHAMPIONS, toying with all the mortal teams, giving them false hope.

Replied: 22nd Jan 2022 at 19:57
Last edited by Don GB : 22nd Jan 2022 at 20:14:00

Posted by: whups (8265) 

until it all comes tumbling down then we,ll see how many of the bandwagoners still go to the emptyhad .

Replied: 23rd Jan 2022 at 01:18

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Whups,

I doubt it coming down as you seemed to hope, especially when City have a more modern Stadium and a better training complex on the same site.

Times in Manchester football have change, so you need to get use to it.

United may have more supporters and all over the country, but that's only because of the way people jumped on the bandwagon of success when United were the richest club in the country and City were not as rich.

Times have changed with not only City becoming, richer but also many other clubs like Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Tottenham etc and now possibly Newcastle who have now got owners richer than United.

Around twenty years ago, I was in London where I saw as many people wearing United shirts than what were wearing shirts of London clubs. On a more recent visit, that was no longer the case as many more were wearing shirts of the top London clubs rather than United.

The song "Things ain't what they used to be" now applies to United!




Replied: 23rd Jan 2022 at 09:55

Posted by: whups (8265) 

showing your "true colours" then owd codger . i suppose todays news that the dutch fa have approached pep to manage the dutch national team then , gone completely over your head . not many years ago i saw people wearing city shirts in my area & they came from out of the woodwork & they are here today but gone tomorrow when the times are bad . unlike us united fans who stick with the club thru thick & thin even if we dont like the owners unlike those who are in the emptyhad .

Replied: 23rd Jan 2022 at 12:21

Posted by: Don GB (597)

Owd Codger,

I have no idea what whups has being saying as he is on ignore, for obvious reasons.

However, you make some very good points which are there for all to see, apart from blinkered trafford "fans", who are stuck in the past.

The world has moved on, I'm sure they realise this but refuse to accept it.

Replied: 23rd Jan 2022 at 20:02
Last edited by Don GB : 12th Feb 2022 at 23:06:42

Posted by: chatty (8767) 


Yea the man who had been there 26 years, won 38 trophies and was approaching 72 retires because of City.

And you call other folk "blinkered"

Then again if he had an inkling of what lengths the Sportswashers were willing to "taint" their "reputation" with dodgy deals and 10 Million Euro fines for not coming clean about them then you may be right

Replied: 23rd Jan 2022 at 21:39

Posted by: whups (8265) 

lets see how many are "blinkered " when the the hand cutters get bored & pep moves on . sir alec only saw his wife suffering when she lost her sister & thats why he retired . get your facts right 0yrs & your mate laughin boy too .

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 01:09

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Whups and Chatty,

Alex Ferguson who was a outstanding Manager retired because he saw the writing was on the wall as richer multi millionaires and consortiums were coming into the Premiership and decided that it was better to go out on a high before the rot set in as it did with a string of Managers following like it did following Busby, ie McGuiness, Cantwell, Sexton etc

And no club has had more bandwagon jumpers over the years than what United got during the "Glory, Glory Man United" years of Matt Busby, Tommy Docherty and Alex Ferguson

A song you don't hear being sung these days!

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 10:06
Last edited by Owd Codger: 24th Jan 2022 at 10:13:14

Posted by: whups (8265) 

get your facts right .

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 10:37

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

My point was the outright irony of a City fan suggesting that Sir Alex Ferguson may have retired due to his "reputation being tainted" by anything relating to Manchester City.
Who knows what would have happened had he stayed on a few more years, they had lost the League with the last kick of the season then strengthened and promptly won the League back with 11 points the season after so it is not beyond the realms of possibility that they would have won it again the season after had he stayed.
But that's pure speculation along with your assumptions so let's stick to the facts!

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 10:38

Posted by: whups (8265) 

do you mean when qpr gave it to them after knowing bolton had lost chatty .

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 11:17

Posted by: Don GB (597)

You won't get anywhere talking sense on this board Owd Codger, you'll soon get fed up of trying to reason with the unreasonable. They already know that what you have spoken is true but they will stick their fingers in their ears and shriek "la la la".

Their ship is sinking and it's hilarious.

Leave them to wallow in their delusion and bitterness.

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 12:02

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

Their ship is sinking and it's hilarious.

As opposed to the submarine needed to plumb the depths of the 3rd Division.


Yip lets just stick to the "facts". Those being 26 seasons 38 trophies with doubles and trebles all round.

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 12:30

Posted by: frecky (386)

Sorry chatty, all you keep posting is 'istree.....

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 13:41

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

Yes and all in response to the point as to why the master retired, which in itself is "istree"

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 13:51

Posted by: frecky (386)

I don't think Fergie retired solely due to Man. city, but Owd codger does have a point regarding the catch up in money to United from other top clubs......Fergie was a clever and very astute manager. He knew it was rebuilding time and maybe he just thought he was getting to old to go through it all again because he'd done it on a regular basis before....really we shouldn't be talking about Fergie, because as you say it's "istree"

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 14:06

Posted by: Don GB (597)

"Sorry chatty, all you keep posting is 'istree"

It's very sad (not), it's like a wrinkled old lady (trafford) trying to convince that she was once pretty and desirable whilst currently surrounded by younger, stunning, more desirable beauties.

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 15:11
Last edited by Don GB : 24th Jan 2022 at 15:15:44

Posted by: GOLDEN BEAR (4737) 

HI Don GB. I thought i had a decent rapport with you ,i hope that i am not included with that comment ...GB

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 15:13

Posted by: Don GB (597)

Not at all GB, I'm sure you are both stunning and desirable!

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 15:14

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

@ frecky
We shouldn't be but I didn't bring him up

I also have a decent rapport with him GB.
Which is quite amazing seeing he has me on "ignore" (yea right)
and he goes out of his way to "ignore " my post's so is unable to ever give a backhanded reply to them.

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 15:34

Posted by: GOLDEN BEAR (4737) 

DonGB;
Stunning Maybe ? But &Desirable ????????
GB .

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 16:45

Posted by: whups (8265) 

at least we have a istory to be proud of .and i think grealish isnt going to have much of a istory there either .

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 16:51
Last edited by whups: 24th Jan 2022 at 16:52:46

Posted by: frecky (386)

Still 'istree.....in the past , no more.......look it up...

Replied: 24th Jan 2022 at 19:20

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

I looked it up, it says: "istree"= fact, ie. It actually happened.

Then I looked up it's antonym ( opposite) it came up with gonna.
e.g, We are "gonna" win the Champions League, we are "gonna" dominate world football.
Meaning it hasn't happened.

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 07:04

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Don GB

You have got to feel sorry for people who cannot see the wood because the trees are in the way.

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 07:38
Last edited by Owd Codger: 25th Jan 2022 at 07:45:14

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 08:18

Posted by: Don GB (597)

Quite Owd Codger,

There's none so blind as those who will not see.

Especially those who are aware of their club's obvious inferiority, which is there for all to see.

All they have now is istree.

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 11:07
Last edited by Don GB : 25th Jan 2022 at 11:09:29

Posted by: frecky (386)

EEh eck Chatty.....you're beginning to sound like Whupsy.....how many times do I have to say that nobody can or will deny how good utd was ..... but that's in the past...not now ....so therefore it's 'istree...innit.

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 11:10

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Least we have istree .
Multiple P L winners .
C l winners .
The only team to win the longed for treble .
What the berties would give for that in there istree .
A top bertie official said the other day the failure v chelsea in the C L final cuts very deep still given they appointed pep at huge cost to win them the said trophy.
And oyears would have us believe they dont care if they dont win the C L .
Yeah ..right .

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 11:34

Posted by: whups (8265) 

there,s plenty of wood in your heads owd codger ( laughing boy ) & 0yrs . you 2 cant crow about anything can you .

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 11:43

Posted by: Don GB (597)

Like I said:

All they have now is istree.

"I used to be pretty many years ago, honest, honest I was, please believe me, pleeeaaaaaaasee."

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 12:05
Last edited by Don GB : 25th Jan 2022 at 12:36:06

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i very much doubt it schoolteacher.

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 12:40

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Oyears.
You seem blind to the fact that the berties are desperate to lift the C L trophy .
Pep is already lining up another job and is clearly ready to quit after this current season after they again fail to win the C L trophy.
Taxi for pep.
Taxi for pep.

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 12:50

Posted by: Don GB (597)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YymGJKhGgY

Replied: 25th Jan 2022 at 12:58

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i,m afraid alan he means all united fans .

Replied: 26th Jan 2022 at 11:02

Posted by: GOLDEN BEAR (4737) 

PEP for manager of the HOLLAND TEAM ???? Is that on the cards for 2023 , He is quoted has saying it's something that has been on his list for quite a long time .. also his bro may be involved .....GB

Replied: 26th Jan 2022 at 15:52

Posted by: Don GB (597)

Pep will have been with the CHAMPIONS for seven trophy laden years when his contract expires having originally signed for three. If he wants to leave after that time he will go with the thanks and blessings of every Blue (and also to the relief of many supporters of other teams). It has been suggested that he won't leave until he has won the European knockout trophy. If that's the case I hope we never win it. ????

Replied: 26th Jan 2022 at 21:01
Last edited by Don GB : 26th Jan 2022 at 21:03:22

Posted by: whups (8265) 

nowhere near sir alex .it,s been reported slan that he,s already been approached for the job .

Replied: 26th Jan 2022 at 23:55

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Whups.

Your are correct, but if Sir Alex was still manager of United today, would he still have the same success with other top clubs having more money than United had in the past as being the richest club in the british game.

As for Pop "lining up another job", its more a case of Holland and other clubs/nations wanting him rather than him having any need to apply for any job.

You need to stop living in the past!



Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 07:42
Last edited by Owd Codger: 27th Jan 2022 at 07:44:56

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i,m not living in the past am i & it,s not me who continually brings up the word "istory" is it . but we do have a history to be proud of unlike some who think they are the worlds best but cant win the champions league despite being overwhelming favouites to do so .

Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 11:19

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Another deluded post from oyears.
He is saying the berties are not bothered if they win the C L or not .
Of course they are bothered .
Why did they appoint pep in the first place then..?.
They detest the fact they have never won the C L and united have .
Bitter dosnt begin to describe .

Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 13:43

Posted by: whups (8265) 

considering they are "supposed" to be the best team in the world it,s a poor show grim .

Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 15:00

Posted by: Tiger cat (636) 

Getting his excuse in early like every year, even if they did win it their efforts over the past few seasons have been poor when they are supposed to have the best team.

Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 15:33

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i hope they are still on here when it goes bang .

Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 15:41

Posted by: frecky (386)

Will it be as big as a bang made by Utd after Fergie...

Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 19:11

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Ive said before now that he will be gone when they fail to win the C L this season.
He failed to win it at Bayern so they got rid .
Be the same sorry tale at the berties as pep swans off to pick a few tulips in Amsterdam.

Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 19:28

Posted by: frecky (386)

Just like all the managers after Fergie couldn't win the prem...????????????

Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 22:03

Posted by: whups (8265) 

so you rate city,s history better than united then .

Replied: 27th Jan 2022 at 23:52

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Same old comments from the same handful of United supporters living in the days of past glories.

Our club is bigger, better and won more trophies and has more history than your club.

Like kids in a playground saying my conker is bigger than your conker!


Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 08:47
Last edited by Owd Codger: 28th Jan 2022 at 09:26:02

Posted by: frecky (386)

Whups....it appears when given facts you don't like, you always go on about history.......it's really become boring...

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 10:28

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

If its your veiw that its boring why not intro a topic we can all get our teeth in rather than criticise others .

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 11:09

Posted by: whups (8265) 

in fact frecky it,s city fans like don gb who constantly bring up the "istory" jibe so get your facts right . yes & your head is bigger than saturn codger .

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 11:21

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

There does seem to be a couple on here who never haver told us their dog in the fight!
They don't half seem to be overly concerned with Uniteds state whether it's good bad or indifferent I wonder if there is any particular reason?


Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 11:22

Posted by: Tiger cat (636) 

I wonder if they are 2 distant cousins of laughing stock, neverstill, kellysdad or whoever he was at the time.

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 12:46

Posted by: Tiger cat (636) 

Sorry double post, not same on a mobile.

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 12:46
Last edited by Tiger cat: 28th Jan 2022 at 12:47:50

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i think you have a point there tiger .

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 12:57

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Doppelganger perhaps t c .

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 13:00

Posted by: frecky (386)

United supporters.......
so sad ....

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 13:56

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Not nearly as sad as you.
Not the nous to post an interesting thread .
Says it all really .

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 14:17

Posted by: peter g (3052) 

This appears to be going a familiar way with a couple of these low batters. There's definitely a pattern here somewhere.

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 14:19

Posted by: frecky (386)

...still sad....nothing will change.

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 14:40

Posted by: whups (8265) 

so sad city & l/pool fans & that wont change either .

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 15:44

Posted by: frecky (386)

Grasping at straws young whups......

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 19:17

Posted by: whups (8265) 

not as many as you .

Replied: 28th Jan 2022 at 23:45

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

They sure don't like hearing about how United has declined since "Fergie Time"

Replied: 29th Jan 2022 at 07:00
Last edited by Owd Codger: 29th Jan 2022 at 08:18:40

Posted by: whups (8265) 

owd codger your replies have become very suspicious just like neverstill,laughing boy , kellys dad & the like .

Replied: 29th Jan 2022 at 11:26

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Whups...

Replied: 29th Jan 2022 at 11:52

Posted by: peter g (3052) 

Why are we sad whups we are happy with our manager and team and also have won the CL 6 times

Replied: 29th Jan 2022 at 12:09

Posted by: whups (8265) 

just in reply to frecky peterg .

Replied: 29th Jan 2022 at 13:03

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Whups,

Surely, even a child can see the difference in the level of comment by myself compared to those made by yourself and the person you seemed to think I am!



Replied: 30th Jan 2022 at 09:12

Posted by: whups (8265) 

maybe you shud enlighten us laughing boy because your posts were as infantile as it gets .

Replied: 31st Jan 2022 at 12:09

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

frecky,

How can you have a proper discussion with someone so low on the grey cells.

Replied: 1st Feb 2022 at 08:15

Posted by: frecky (386)

Just take it as it comes.....

Replied: 1st Feb 2022 at 11:21

Posted by: whups (8265) 

being "low on grey cells" you shud know as you opitomise it .

Replied: 1st Feb 2022 at 11:59

Posted by: Don GB (597)

achte auf die Lücke

Replied: 3rd Feb 2022 at 17:29

Posted by: whups (8265) 

which gap is that 0yrs the gap between mendy & jail .

Replied: 4th Feb 2022 at 00:06

Posted by: peter g (3052) 

They think It's all over. It's not yet

Replied: 20th Feb 2022 at 11:26

Posted by: whups (8265) 

they are starting to wobble .

Replied: 20th Feb 2022 at 11:58

Posted by: frecky (386)

If they do whupsy, there's a great chance your mates from Merseyside could win it........that would be bliss wouldn't it.

Replied: 20th Feb 2022 at 18:36

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i dont know ,would it as chelsea arnt out of it yet .

Replied: 20th Feb 2022 at 23:53

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Whups

You seemed to have forgot about Greenwood

Replied: 21st Feb 2022 at 00:21

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i hav,nt forgot about greenwood at all but you seem to have forgot about the law of "innocent until proven guilty " .

Replied: 21st Feb 2022 at 11:44

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Whups,

So by your reply, you think the same about Ryan Giggs?

Replied: 22nd Feb 2022 at 07:41

Posted by: whups (8265) 

yes i do . why are you so persistant on just man united subjects & no other ? . are you laughing boy in disguise ? .

Replied: 22nd Feb 2022 at 12:57

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Just to remind codger cobbledick that Ryan Giggs faces charges at M C crown court in august this year .
He is innocent until proven otherwise.
Mason Greenwood is on police bail .
My suggestion would be to refrain from implying anything about the matter .

Replied: 22nd Feb 2022 at 13:28

Posted by: whups (8265) 

the more you look at both charges the more it looks like a spurned girlfriend looking for some payback .

Replied: 22nd Feb 2022 at 23:55

Posted by: broady (18048) 

I have a gut feeling both will be found guilty. If anyone is found not guilty it will be Giggs.

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 01:32
Last edited by broady: 23rd Feb 2022 at 04:55:05

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

grimshaw.

I have never implied that Greenwood or Giggs are guilty until proven innocent.

Just made the point that Whups seems to have forgot that Greenwood is involved in an alledged case of abuse of women like Giggs.

And do you have to give a example of the usual football type nastiness in your reply?

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 08:03

Posted by: whups (8265) 

yes alledged but iv,e noticed that you attack just united fans & the team . why is that ? .

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 11:26

Posted by: fossil (7225)

whups did you see the injuries that Greenwoods girl friend suffered?

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 13:50

Posted by: whups (8265) 

did you . it looks a set-up . did you see him inflicting them ? .have you noticed it,s gone very quiet from her end ? .

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 16:26

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Yes I did!
No I didn't see them being inflicted but I saw a picture of the young ladies injuries on the morning after on social media and they weren't pretty.
And also heard a recording of the incident which she was bright enough to record.
They were removed very quickly, by whom I have no idea.
So I ask again whups,did you see her injuries?
And it's probably quiet because a court case beckons.
I heard what he said on the recording and her telling him no, and it certainly didn't sound anything like the set up you suggest.

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 16:42

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

They were removed by her so legend has it.
It has gone so very quiet as whups says.

I have seen the pics .
It would be wrong if we rushed to judgement .
Far far better to wait and see.

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 18:20

Posted by: fossil (7225)

So do you think it was a set up Grimshaw having seen the injuries she had?
whups does!

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 19:16

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

It could be so .
Then again it could be a genuine assault .
I refuse to judge until more is known.
Time will tell as in the Ryan Giggs case.

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 19:24

Posted by: fossil (7225)

You like a bet!What odds of Greenwood being guilty then. 10/1 on for me with that evidence.

Replied: 23rd Feb 2022 at 19:32

Posted by: whups (8265) 

if people like you were judging they would be guilty before any trial . yes i did see some injuries but who inflicted them , do you know .

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 00:00
Last edited by whups: 24th Feb 2022 at 01:24:31

Posted by: fossil (7225)

“whups did you see the injuries that Greenwoods girl friend suffered?”

Whups that was what I said,and then I replied to the set up comments ,and then I said what I had seen. All it needed was you to say you had seen it.

I didn’t say he was guilty but I wouldn’t bet against it.

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 08:26

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i did,nt see any time or date on those pics ? . that could have been from a fall months ago & i reiterate that her web site has gone missing which leaves a doubt on the matter .and if i were you i,d keep my money in my pocket .

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 11:37

Posted by: fossil (7225)

whups,I wouldn't know or be interested in her or her website to be frank, and I commented that I saw the pictures that morning, could have been on facebook but more than likely twitter, that SHE posted and then was reposted and heard the audio tape she also published.
She removed them fairly swiftly ,could have been on the intervention of her father and his advice,
That doesn't seem to be the course of action that someone after some compensation would have done.
What I saw and heard was obviously seen by the police and media and led to the arrest of Greenwood later that day and the investigation that is ongoing.
And that is why I formed my own opinion on what I SAW and commented so, as above.

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 12:11

Posted by: whups (8265) 

you formed an "opinion" that found him guilty before any trial . your like a lot of people on here who jump the gun.

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 12:20

Posted by: fossil (7225)

I won’t find him guilty !
If he is the courts will.
My view was that I didn’t fancy his chances of being found not guilty ,if he ever is tried.
Do you understand that!!

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 13:08

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Fossil.
You must surely admit that for now the greenwood talk is all conjecture .
You are spot on when you say i like a bet .
But i woudnt have one single sov on greenwood even being charged let alone being found guilty at any forthcoming trial.
Keep your sovs in your pocket .

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 13:52

Posted by: whups (8265) 

you started this fossil & you never took anything into account like these footballers are targeted by these women . like i said you jumped the gun .

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 16:07

Posted by: fossil (7225)

whups it doesn't take long to find out WHO STARTED it ,so just check back on this thread and you will see that you accuse me wrongly as I DIDN'T bring it up.
I commented!
You don't seem to be the apologising type, so I probably won't get one.
Grimshaw, It is conjecture, absolutely correct, and the police are the ones conjecting.
My OPINION is that he will be lucky if he is not charged given the info and evidence seen by social media!

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 16:39

Posted by: whups (8265) 

your alter ego was the 1 to bring up greenwood & you were the 1st to judge without a trial which i dont think it will go that far . so as for being first you were the 1st to judge wernt you .

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 16:42
Last edited by whups: 24th Feb 2022 at 16:44:53

Posted by: whups (8265) 

and further more as far as OPINIONS are concerned if people were like you there would be no-need for courtrooms .

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 16:46

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Haha ,alter ego,best laugh I have had in ages

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 17:54
Last edited by fossil : 24th Feb 2022 at 18:08:10

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Fossil.
The police are not conjecting.
They are presumably interviewing and gathering as much clear and precise evidence as they can.You should know that evidence based purely on social media is flimsy at best.
Thats why greenwood has been released on police bail.
I am sure truth will out and justice be prevailed one way or the other .

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 19:14

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Grimshaw,good that’s what we want,so who it upsets

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 20:18

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Grimshaw,good that’s what we want,so who it upsets

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 20:18

Posted by: whups (8265) 

it wont upset you because you,ve already made your judgment .

Replied: 24th Feb 2022 at 23:51

Posted by: sammys (57) 

fossil what price you giving me on mendy and you haven't seen no evidence ????

Replied: 25th Feb 2022 at 21:02

Posted by: frecky (386)

Wtf has Mendy got to do with it.....typical deflection tactics by whupsy.,..????????????

Replied: 25th Feb 2022 at 23:32

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Its that man again!

The one who gets confused on who is who!

Replied: 26th Feb 2022 at 00:02

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Sammys,go to William Hill!!!

Replied: 26th Feb 2022 at 08:50

Posted by: fossil (7225)

A phone malfunction!!

Replied: 26th Feb 2022 at 08:50
Last edited by fossil : 26th Feb 2022 at 08:52:22

Posted by: whups (8265) 

there,s a malfunction in your brian.

Replied: 26th Feb 2022 at 17:03

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Are you English? Brian indeed! A malfunction with your spelling eh.

Replied: 26th Feb 2022 at 21:21

Posted by: whups (8265) 

you got the message .

Replied: 27th Feb 2022 at 00:07

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Haha hilarious! I think that I would take more notice of a message from an alien,they probably use their BRIANS more

End of Message

Replied: 27th Feb 2022 at 11:47

Posted by: whups (8265) 

yes you got it alright . so now carry it on & show yourself up more that you already have .

Replied: 27th Feb 2022 at 12:23

Posted by: peter g (3052) 

Everton had a clear cut penalty claim turned down last night, It should have been 1-1

Replied: 27th Feb 2022 at 12:27

Posted by: fossil (7225)

whups you need to take the blinkers off and recognise there are superior teams in the premier league than Man U.
I am not one but I can understand why people become ABU’s when you see the biased comments on here.
End of message

Replied: 27th Feb 2022 at 13:54

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Peter g ,I agree, it should have been a penalty without a doubt!

Replied: 27th Feb 2022 at 13:57

Posted by: whups (8265) 

you shud do the same as it seems you target 1 team .

Replied: 27th Feb 2022 at 14:02

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Come on Liverpool,
End of message

Replied: 27th Feb 2022 at 16:30

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Sammys,Mendy 3/1 to keep a clean sheet. Glad to help.

Replied: 27th Feb 2022 at 17:04
Last edited by fossil : 27th Feb 2022 at 17:04:58

Posted by: whups (8265) 

citys mendy 1/1000 to go down .

Replied: 28th Feb 2022 at 11:55

Posted by: frecky (386)

Will Mason see him in the same jail.......

Replied: 28th Feb 2022 at 14:04

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i very much doubt it . he,s not up for 7 rapes is he .

Replied: 28th Feb 2022 at 15:48

Posted by: frecky (386)

As you keep shouting from the rooftops.....innocent until proven guilty, or does that not apply to non Utd personnel.....

Replied: 28th Feb 2022 at 19:54

Posted by: whups (8265) 

ok then wot,s your odds that mendy is found guilty . 7 rapes & more pending cant be wrong . both giggs& greenwood are being targeted by spurned girlfreinds .

Replied: 28th Feb 2022 at 23:50

Posted by: frecky (386)

Whups...It's hard to not think that Mendy is innocent, but until convicted by the law he is still deemed innocent. So are the Utd duo, but to blame spurned girlfriends seems to be clutching at straws a wee bit....anyroad, there's nowt we can do about any of it....

Replied: 1st Mar 2022 at 10:44

Posted by: whups (8265) 

why has it gone so cold in both cases frecky ? .

Replied: 1st Mar 2022 at 11:27

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

My journo pal was out and about in M C city centre yesterday and buzzed me with some juicy stuff that he had heard in a watering hole well patronised by both utd and bertie supporters.
I am sworn to silence but it is v juicy .
Just saying that at times there is often more than meets the eye.

Replied: 1st Mar 2022 at 11:41

Posted by: whups (8265) 

i would,nt be suprised grim .

Replied: 1st Mar 2022 at 12:19

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Ditto whups .

Replied: 1st Mar 2022 at 12:23

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Grimshaw

Has your jourmo pal by any chance heard anything about United installing a small ground with a stand at Carrington for the Reserves, Youth and Women's team to play their home games rather than playing at them at other grounds like Bury, Altringham, Salford and now even Leigh.

That's what United supporters want to hear about, not about rumours in Manchester City Centre.

Replied: 2nd Mar 2022 at 08:13
Last edited by Owd Codger: 3rd Mar 2022 at 07:53:19

Posted by: whups (8265) 

true to your calling laughing boy yet another post calling united . why dont you give it a rest .

Replied: 2nd Mar 2022 at 10:31

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Owd Codger,
Could it be one of Grimm fairy tales!

Replied: 2nd Mar 2022 at 15:16

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Who said the rumours were about the berties .
You clearly have much difficulty in grasping the most basic stuff on here .
Fossil and Codger -allegedly -
Dumb and dumber .
The A B U brigade peddling the same crap.

Replied: 2nd Mar 2022 at 18:47

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Haha I never mentioned either,It was banter! Grimms fairy tales…..get it!!
I could quite easily develop into an ABU if I took much notice of you lot and as a season ticket holder at Wigan Athletic who beat City at Wembley in the FA Cup Final,I could hardly be a supporter of them, but I like their style and they are very successful, so I compliment them for that.

Replied: 2nd Mar 2022 at 20:00

Posted by: broady (18048) 

Fossil and Codger = dumb and dumber.

What about Grim and the Midnight Marauder? Words fail me.

Replied: 2nd Mar 2022 at 21:06
Last edited by broady: 2nd Mar 2022 at 22:49:34

Posted by: whups (8265) 

wot about bullshit billy too .

Replied: 2nd Mar 2022 at 23:47
Last edited by whups: 3rd Mar 2022 at 01:12:49

Posted by: whups (8265) 

was,nt laughing boy a supposedly a latics supporter ? .

Replied: 2nd Mar 2022 at 23:54

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Whups,

If he is, he is in good company with fossil, myself and others in Wigan who support their own town teams and are not bandwagon jumpers, especially if of the armchair kind.

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 07:52

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Well said Owd Codger,and the owner and admin support their local team as well.
Wigan World for Wigan sport.

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 09:17

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

The bloke you are referring to actually "jumped on the band wagon" once Latics got promoted to the Prem so he could go and watch teams like United in the flesh
He couldn't quite bring himself to admit it once he was rumbled though

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 09:41

Posted by: whups (8265) 

maybe your the same chap ? .it,s well known that kellys dad,laughing boy,sergio123, neverstill had multiple profiles on here & could,nt lie straight in bed .

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 11:24

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Whups .
Terrific reference .Love it.
Bull shit billy .The alleged utd fan.
The classic closet A B U .

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 12:17

Posted by: whups (8265) 

absolutely grim & "allegedly" is the right word . he comes on here & the 1st chance he gets slags the club or players off with regularity .

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 12:24

Posted by: broady (18048) 

If Paddy had a Brian he would be dangerous.

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 12:46

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Whups .
Spot on analysis .
Cue more of the same bullshit from him soon.

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 12:46

Posted by: broady (18048) 

I was talking to a man in a bar last night whose sister-in-laws brother has a son who went to school with a lad who was friendly with an ex United player daughter in law and he told me that United’s next Manager is ???????????????.

Do you mean that sort of BS because you seem to have cornered that market.

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 12:56

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Please explain bullshit.
You talk in riddles .
Typical bertie .

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 13:16

Posted by: broady (18048) 

If someone disagrees with your views of Unied it seems they have to be City fans. What a strange world you and Paddy live in. Watching United currently is like reading a poor book. You keep on reading it in the hope that it will get better and it never seems to. Hope United make a fist of it this weekend.

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 13:32

Posted by: fossil (7225)

I see the bullies are out broady.
Scoop grimshaw ,the site new newsman,and the midnight moron sussing out Kelly’s dads to play with before grassing him to Ron!

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 13:52

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

No stranger than you bullshit .
Hypocrite dosnt begin to describe given you said you didnt really read my posts .
Just for you fossil .
My pal is a stringer fot the nationals and sundays .
You know s f a pal.
Your ignorance clearly shows .

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 14:19

Posted by: whups (8265) 

reverting to name calling again broady i see . it shows you for wot you really are a liar & bullshiter . did,nt you say in your own words that you put me on ignore ? after telling people to use the ignore button . wideboys like you always come unstuck when saying 1 thing & doing another . hypoctite or wot .

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 15:15

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Spot on on broady,a mate of a mate who is a slinger,who only works part time listening to gossip(top secret)!
The mind boggles!!

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 15:26
Last edited by fossil : 3rd Mar 2022 at 15:30:21

Posted by: whups (8265) 

looking for allies again laughing boy . your pathetic.

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 15:34

Posted by: broady (18048) 

Paddy,
I was at a loose end so decided to check out your latest ramblings. Nothing has changed. Same old, same old baloney. Have a good day.

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 16:06

Posted by: frecky (386)

Brody, fossil.....

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 17:14

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Beware frecky you could be classed as an ally now

Replied: 3rd Mar 2022 at 18:45

Posted by: whups (8265) 

and checked out your latest name calling too i hope . wideboys like you are wot you are , hypocrites .and those birds on your profile must have flown out of your supid head .

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 00:05

Posted by: broady (18048) 

“Supid head” Really. QED.

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 06:46

Posted by: whups (8265) 

yes most definitely wideboy .

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 11:22

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

Fossil.
Clearly you havnt a scooby what a stringer is.
You display your ignorance .
Keep it up .
You give me a good laugh with your inane ramblings ..

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 13:25

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Grimshaw,apologies,my predictive text threw out Slinger.I meant stringer a free lance journo .
I probably met a few when I used to frequent Withy Grove where a relation had a pub many years ago which was full of pressmen.
Many years ago so if I met a stringer I wouldn’t know it and probably wouldn’t be bothered any way.
They all seemed to be over the plimsoll line with ale than knowledge to be honest.
Glad you like my ramblings,it’s reciprocal.

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 17:26

Posted by: grimshaw (3220) 

I recall a few pubs in the withy grove area we would frequent after a utd game .
Not far to stagger to Victoria ..
Keep up the good work fossil .
To quote P E .

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 19:37

Posted by: frecky (386)

Cheers fossil, but I'm already a condemned man regarding any thing Utd...........they don't like it up em...

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 20:23

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

Why when have you ever put "it up em"?

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 20:35

Posted by: frecky (386)

Ey up .....the leader of the gang appears.....I'll answer that by saying what you said when I asked you a direct question....Look back through my posts....

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 20:41

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

Ey up .....the leader of the gang appears..

That opening line answers everything about your confused state of mind, no need for me to look any further
Thanks

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 20:56
Last edited by chatty: 4th Mar 2022 at 20:57:27

Posted by: frecky (386)

So sad....????

Replied: 4th Mar 2022 at 22:34

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Larry, Mo and Curley

But, which one is which?

Replied: 5th Mar 2022 at 00:06

Posted by: whups (8265) 

well your certainly mo coz he,s bald just like you .

Replied: 5th Mar 2022 at 01:08

Posted by: frecky (386)

Still sad.....

Replied: 5th Mar 2022 at 10:32

Posted by: Domin0 (321)

Curly was the bald one.

Replied: 5th Mar 2022 at 17:17

Posted by: whups (8265) 

him too .

Replied: 5th Mar 2022 at 23:59

Posted by: peter g (3052) 

Come on Man U, I'm a fan for the day . Y.N.W.A.

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 11:33

Posted by: whups (8265) 

cant see it peter g.

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 12:27

Posted by: peter g (3052) 

Last week you said City were wobbling I hope they have.

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 13:11

Posted by: whups (8265) 

lets be honest they were very lucky against everton ? .

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 13:14

Posted by: peter g (3052) 

Everton were robbed of a penalty and it affected us too

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 13:27

Posted by: fossil (7225)

It was a definite penalty but City could have had 6,but their finishing was poor.
Everton were awful and Frank has a tough job!

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 13:34

Posted by: broady (18048) 

And, if reports are correct, Everton now have a £300 million black hole in their finances now the Russian has been blackballed. Less money for Frank to re-build.

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 13:44

Posted by: fossil (7225)

I think the stadium build at Bramley Moore Dock might suffer but Moshiri has plenty of money.

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 13:47
Last edited by fossil : 7th Mar 2022 at 00:23:05

Posted by: peter g (3052) 

It's like Wakefield and Castleford they will soon be moving to a new ground but it never happens

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 14:02

Posted by: Don GB (597)

I shall return when I've stopped laughing.

I could be a while!

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 22:34
Last edited by Don GB : 6th Mar 2022 at 23:33:18

Posted by: whups (8265) 

you wanna grow-up schollteacher . wait till it all comes tumblin down & we,ll see if you still come on here .

Replied: 6th Mar 2022 at 23:53

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

peter g

Only because of getting no help from Wakefield City Council in finding new sites with the result that both clubs have now decided to re-developed their existing Stadiums

In contrast, St Helens and Warrington Wolves had no problems with their Councils finding a site for a new Stadium.

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 07:40

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Whups,

Perhaps United need to get new owners in the form of super rich Arabs etc

If it were to happen, you and a few other supporters are going to end up with big eggs of your faces!

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 07:56

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Peter g,I was just wondering why you thought the new build at Everton would not happen!
The Everton owner is reputed to be worth about 2 billion,maybe not all disposable but I would think he would have the borrowing power to cover the costs of the new build!
Edit. I have just seen that Moshiri’s contribution is 100 million and a further 350 from private investors which I assume he has got or capable of obtaining.
I agree about the points about council help,Everton had that.

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 10:03
Last edited by fossil : 7th Mar 2022 at 10:15:15

Posted by: whups (8265) 

maybe you shud tell us who you are laughing boy & our supporters tough it out when it gets rough unlike some on here who go into hiding when their team loses .

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 11:30

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Two questions hoping for an intelligent response.
What does the cabal of United followers on here think of the comments made by Roy Keane and Gary Neville after the match yesterday, when they said they were embarrassed and disgusted at the performance of United. Where they right?
And Alex Ferguson remark when asked a few years ago about whether Man City would ever overtake United replied "Not in my lifetime".
Would he be embarrassed as well as they clearly have done?
My opinion was that Man U played ok in the first half but were outplayed in the second, and didn't seem to try very hard in that period.
Money from the middle east wouldn't make a difference, some smart recruiting would!

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 12:03

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

Why do United need to get owners in the form of super rich Arabs etc?
If they did, then started "winning" the big trophies again it would only confirm what I have been saying for ages.
It's all meritless

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 12:09

Posted by: Tiger cat (636) 

Fossil, yes both were spot on, United were good in first half but shocking in second, they need a good clear out and buy young hungry players who will fight every minute in every game

The second about fergy , at present city are miles ahead of united but no they have not passed them, to do that they will have to win champions league 3 times and league over 21 times, and I don't think fergy will be alive by that time.

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 12:21

Posted by: Don GB (597)

Well, I've supressed my guffaws for long enough to pass comment.

What a chucklesome day that was. The thrashing of the has beens, and all but consigning them to playing second/third rate European football next season.

Owd Codger said: "Perhaps United need to get new owners in the form of super rich Arabs etc".

That would make no difference, they already spend more than any other club and have the resources to continue to do so. It isn't about the money you spend, it's how you spend the money, and yesterday's humiliation (which was shown around the world), highlighted the inadequacies of their player purchasing "strategy".

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 14:21

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Tiger cat,I just asked if you thought Sir Alex would be embarrassed by his statement in his lifetime.
My humble opinion is that City are very superior than Man U at the present time!

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 14:40

Posted by: whups (8265) 

why is all your negative interest aimed at just 1 club , united . can you give us your explination for this ? .

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 15:17

Posted by: whups (8265) 

tiger they,ll have to win the CL 4 times to top united & not forgeting 12 fa cups .guys there is young hungry players in the under 23s but are farmed out because they cant get in for the old dead wood that keeps getting picked over them ? .

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 15:21

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

..highlighted the inadequacies of their player purchasing "strategy".

Which have now hopefully finally changed with the departure of Woodward, the banker who helped the Glazers buy the club with a credit card so was put in charge of the footballing side for some bizzare reason as a thank you.

Whups the interest is because they are big news!

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 15:38

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Whups If you are referring to me I asked two questions and asked for intelligent answers if possible.
Tiger cat tried and I commend him!
As far as my questions,I spoke about yesterdays match,it was big news as chatty said,that is why I commented and I spoke about BOTH teams and if you can see anything positive about the performance of United I would be interested since you haven’t mentioned it yet!

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 16:21

Posted by: whups (8265) 

good in the 1st half bad in the 2nd . is that enough for you .you still hav,nt fully answered my question have you .

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 17:28

Posted by: fossil (7225)

Whups look at my post at 12.03 those were the questions I asked!
You commented on neither!

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 19:42

Posted by: whups (8265) 

yes i have but you wont answer mine .why is it that your only against 1 team ? .

Replied: 7th Mar 2022 at 23:53

Posted by: Owd Codger (586)

Chatty

Of course, United are big news.

But, now for all the wrong reasons!



Replied: 8th Mar 2022 at 07:06

Posted by: fossil (7225)

I have put whups on ignore ,maybe It’s possible to converse with sensible people again without being accused of being negative about Man Utd when the whole football nation except he says they played badly at weekend !!!

Replied: 8th Mar 2022 at 08:13

Posted by: whups (8265) 

great i,ll wear it as a badge of honour . your full of negativity .

Replied: 8th Mar 2022 at 11:58

Posted by: chatty (8767) 

Cowd Todger

Yea I have noticed, and all the wrong reasons don't make you "fed up"

Replied: 8th Mar 2022 at 12:07

Posted by: whups (8265) 

isnt it funny chatty that he has to put a derogotory comment about united ? .

Replied: 8th Mar 2022 at 12:25

 

Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.