Interact
Interact


MEGHAN AND HARRY.

Started by: broady (16580) 

Is anyone really interested in their opinions or lives? They have turned their back on the UK so should that not be it?

Started: 30th Jun 2020 at 05:20

Posted by: FAT MICK (inactive)

Yes millions will be interested in them and what they get up to especially in Canada and the United States.

Replied: 30th Jun 2020 at 06:52

Posted by: roylew (3223)

I agree broady....she got the wedding she wanted and all that goes with it ....and Harry fell for it....but he’ll be back here at sometime in his life

Replied: 30th Jun 2020 at 06:55

Posted by: chatty (8053) 

Come on broady spot the irony

Replied: 30th Jun 2020 at 08:07

Posted by: kathpressey (5240) 

Apparently they have signed up with an agency for public speaking£1m per speech , can't be bad . But as someone said what can Harry talk about apart from his mother? They both have opinions on everything but Harry especially has no experience of the real world. Such a strange couple. I did think about Harry when William published a photo on Fathers' dat where he was laughing with Charles. Time will tell

Replied: 30th Jun 2020 at 08:59

Posted by: FAT MICK (inactive)

Harry can talk about being a helicopter pilot and fighting in Afghanistan, he can tell loads of tales about all the women he as had for one night stands, he can talk about his dad coming home at breakfast time after he had been out with Camila

Replied: 30th Jun 2020 at 10:59

Posted by: kathpressey (5240) 

Mick it was William who flew helicopters. I'm not sure what Harry did in the army

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 08:32

Posted by: retep1949 (664)

Harry was an helicopter pilot.

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 08:54

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

Harry flew Apaches with the AAC. William flies them too as well as his uncle Andrew, his dad and grandad all chopper pilots.

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 19:03

Posted by: tonker (23077) 

Nobody gives a toss. Well, one or two might, but most people don't even consider them.
As for Mick saying, "millions will be interested in them and what they get up to especially in Canada and the United States." you'll find that not many people in foreign lands have even heard of them, never mind want to know all about them and what they do.

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 20:23

Posted by: broady (16580) 

I can only speak for this part of the world but they had already said no payment for security and I think they were glad to see the back of them.

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 20:34

Posted by: mindar (1334)

I think Harry will make his way home

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 21:06

Posted by: tonker (23077) 

I can't speak for America, but when we were in Spain when it was their wedding, and my Mrs. asked a couple of the local women, "are you watching the wedding"?
Well, they just looked at her blankly, as they hadn't a clue who they were. They'd never even heard of them.

The English are very big-headed about this country, thinking it means something to foreign nationals, but they actually know very little about the UK. Some don't know the UK is split into four countries and where they actually are.

On the other hand, they know all the football clubs, Wigan athletic included, but they don't know where they are geographically.

That said, how many Wiganers know the name of the King of Spain's grandson and who he's married to. Or, even, the names of the 'regions' of Spain and where they are?

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 21:08

Posted by: mindar (1334)

Whos bothered

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 21:14

Posted by: tonker (23077) 

Fat Mick seems to be!

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 21:50

Posted by: FAT MICK (inactive)

All of Phil and Hollys audience will be interested

Replied: 1st Jul 2020 at 22:51

Posted by: Billinge Biker (584)

No doubt the monachy is a big earner from tourism...but it all goes darn sarf...doesnt filter oop north...sack the civil list for the hanger-onners...the upkeep of all the properties and running them must be astronomical..does joe public subsidise this as well ?..met all of the royals in a previous life..Princess Di was a real lovely lady....rest of em...words fail me.

Replied: 2nd Jul 2020 at 09:29

Posted by: FAT MICK (inactive)

Billinge Biker, some of there money goes to Scotland to maintain their castles and employ staff.
I never met Princes Diana personally so all I know about her are just what I read in the papers and heard on the telly.

Replied: 2nd Jul 2020 at 10:59

Posted by: broady (16580) 

More words of wisdom from these clowns. I don’t care how much they embarrass themselves but all that crap rubs off on the Queen who certainly doesn’t deserve it. He has been brought up with monies earned off slavery etc. many years ago.

Replied: 6th Jul 2020 at 17:57

Posted by: firefox (3239)

He's certainly p***y whipped.

Replied: 6th Jul 2020 at 18:00

Posted by: baker boy (15523)

have they been kidnapped by some strange sect or cult,they get more weird as days go by,perhaps they are realising their canadian/usa adventure is a dead end.

Replied: 8th Jul 2020 at 11:50

Posted by: broady (16580) 

Papers full of their cra* again today. Total embarrassment to the Royal Family.

Replied: 25th Jul 2020 at 17:12

Posted by: PeterP (8311)

Why are they even taking so much space in our tabloids. They wanted to get away from the ROYAL connection so has Mr & Mrs let them get on with it . There is only the press who think there is a story .But again it could be the Beckhams every other day in the papers

Replied: 25th Jul 2020 at 18:57

Posted by: Brasstoff (192)

You'd think at least one newspaper would tell the truth about this farce of a marriage. It could be they've all been gagged! And please you don't need to tell me, I know it's not Harry's fault.

Replied: 25th Jul 2020 at 19:12

Posted by: peter israel (1040) 

Do the tabloids real know what is going on ???? i don't think so
only two people do!!! and the rest of us just gossip

Replied: 25th Jul 2020 at 19:56
Last edited by peter israel: 25th Jul 2020 at 20:00:11

Posted by: broady (16580) 

If their bloody faces weren’t all over the papers daily we wouldn’t have anything to gossip about. Fact.

Replied: 25th Jul 2020 at 21:00

Posted by: kathpressey (5240) 

Well I won't be buying the book that's just come out or Meghan's when that comes out. A load of piffle.

Replied: 26th Jul 2020 at 08:49

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

I wonder what conspiracy theories will be when Meghan comes off her Honda SS50 avoiding the press?

Replied: 26th Jul 2020 at 09:51

Posted by: firefox (3239)

"Black woman steals bike"

Replied: 26th Jul 2020 at 10:18

Posted by: berylh (2060)

Either just before or just after the wedding of these two I was watching a chat show where Anne Widdicombe was a guest and she said, that girl will cause havock - and she has. Wise words ....

Replied: 26th Jul 2020 at 12:13

Posted by: whacker (944)

This thread seems to answer its own question.

A post titled "Donald Trump on lower prices" drew only 170 readings and just 2 responses, mine and Firefox. although the subject will eventually affect English drug prices.

A post titled "Megan and Harry" drew a whopping 1009 viewings (probably more by the time I send this) and 29 responses. So yes, I would say that a lot of people are interested in this unlovely couple.

My guess is that within one year Harry will realize that Megan has done a Wallace Simpson on him and he'll split. On the other hand, he doesn't seem that bright...

Replied: 26th Jul 2020 at 17:04
Last edited by whacker: 26th Jul 2020 at 17:07:32

Posted by: momac (11327) 

They so called want privacy, yet are forever looking for attention..you won’t see many photos of her not seeking the cameras out and grinning while Harry always has a scowl on his face,they need to grow up the pair of them.

Replied: 26th Jul 2020 at 18:17

Posted by: broady (16580) 

My goodness. I see they are still prattling on and on. A pair of prize *illocks. Nice new house though from the Bank of Dad.

Replied: 15th Aug 2020 at 16:11

Posted by: Reditus (377)

Not be long before they seperate

Replied: 15th Aug 2020 at 17:26

Posted by: broady (16580) 

That should be good for another nine million column inches.

Replied: 15th Aug 2020 at 17:31

Posted by: Brasstoff (192)

Posted by me
You'd think at least one newspaper would tell the truth about this farce of a marriage. It could be they've all been gagged! And please you don't need to tell me, I know it's not Harry's fault.

Right straight to the point. Who thinks Harry is actually Charles's son?

Replied: 15th Aug 2020 at 18:56

Posted by: Brasstoff (192)

Nobody wants to talk about the elephant in the room?

Replied: 15th Aug 2020 at 19:54

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

I know his mothers knicker elastic was pretty loose over the years, but yes he's Charlies lad.

Replied: 15th Aug 2020 at 20:01

Posted by: Brasstoff (192)

Looks too much like James Hewitt for me.

Replied: 15th Aug 2020 at 20:31

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

His mam and Hewitt didn’t meet until two years after Harry was born. I think he was hired to learn them to ride him being a cavalry officer in 1986.

Replied: 15th Aug 2020 at 20:59

Posted by: basil brush (16183)

I for one, do not give a monkeys about them.

Replied: 16th Aug 2020 at 11:25

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

I never fell for all that poor hard done by Diana, she knew all about Camila well before she got married, her father thought it would elevate the family a bit more and pushed for the wedding. She didn't half go through some blokes though.

Replied: 16th Aug 2020 at 12:06

Posted by: broady (16580) 

I see they are still enjoying life “ away from the limelight” Complete waste of good oxygen.

Replied: 1st Oct 2020 at 16:44

Posted by: broady (16580) 

I see that pair of prize hillocks still crave attention. Why do the press follow their every move? They have made their beds, leave them to rot there.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 04:25

Posted by: firefox (3239)



There’s something really quite tasteless about Prince Harry and Meghan at a cemetery in California, with a photographer that just happened to be there, to make sure they can get in on the action too

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 05:23
Last edited by firefox: 9th Nov 2020 at 05:24:23

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

The Palace refused to send him a wreath as he is no longer a working royal. Hence their own publicity stunt of placing flowers on two commonwealth servicemen's graves in the US one Canadian and an Australian I believe.

I fault no one for paying their respects in any way they can.

I haven't much time for them personally though.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:06

Posted by: cardyhills (40)

I couldn’t give a monkeys chuff about either.

She’s just after money and fame & he is a scrounger.

I long for the day that I see the United Kingdom become the Republics of England, Wales & Scotland.

You may have noticed I left Northern Ireland out as I also long for the day that I see a United Ireland

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:13
Last edited by cardyhills: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:20:29

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

United Republic

United Ireland

Wait till I tell the Pope's wife.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:20

Posted by: cardyhills (40)

Republics are great. Just ask Portugal

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:26

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

How does one speak to a country? Besides I don't speak asturian or mirandese.

I have heard and seen how the the Catholics and Protestants speak to each other in NI. though.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:34

Posted by: cardyhills (40)

Religion is an ailment of common sense.

It clouds our better judgement and stifles our progress as a race.

Do away with Monarchies and Religion and then we are getting somewhere

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:39
Last edited by cardyhills: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:46:28

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

If you say so.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:43

Posted by: cardyhills (40)

It’s not just me, Tez.

There are others who also think like me..
Though I doubt you will find them in your local boozer

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:47
Last edited by cardyhills: 9th Nov 2020 at 13:50:03

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

I wouldn't find anyone in any local boozer I don't use them or the ale and spirits they sell.

I just live in the real world you see an don't have much time for the Shangri La believers or the liberal hearted fools that want to turn this country into a cesspit.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 14:03

Posted by: basil brush (16183)

attention seekers who nobody cares about

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 17:31

Posted by: Platty (375)

I am not a supporter of either of them but Harry, unlike Charles or William (for obvious reasons) have not been involved in conflicts. Harry has been in conflicts and has lost friends and colleagues. In my view he should have been allowed to show his rememberance by laying his wreath at the cenotaph in London, where those others had been fighting for their country. Petty.

However, I do wonder if he knows a bit about his mother's death which has, and is, being suppressed, and he cannot reveal what he knows which is tormenting him.
I am pointed towards that by the Martin Bashir duplicity supported by the BBC for the Diana interview.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 18:02

Posted by: PeterP (8311)

Platty Harry is just a member of the public now NO royal privilages now so if joe public (ex service people) could not lay their wreaths why should he

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 18:07

Posted by: basil brush (16183)

He's now claiming he didn't do it for publicity.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 18:09

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

Poppycock !

Poppycock !

And Poppycock !

Harry is an ex-miltary man, and if he had NOT laid a wreath he would have been vilified, and if HAD have laid a wreath he would have been vilified, the old catch-22 thing, damned if does, and damned if he doesn't, I think the two of them are trying to turn their backs on the scrounging Royals thing.

Why don't you Royal Haters, go and shove a ferret up your bum

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 18:32

Posted by: Brasstoff (192)

Nothing royal about these two plonkers. Mr &Mrs Hewitt.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 18:40

Posted by: broady (16580) 

TTS,
First of all I am not anti royal. Neither do I deny he had a right to lay a wreath. However he turned his back on the Royal Family. If he wanted to lay a wreath why was it choreographed with a celebrity cameraman in attendance? Everything those two does has an ulterior motive. Maybe publicity for their upcoming Netflix documentary.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 18:45

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

Well now that they have jacked in the Royal job, and they are now both signing on, they have to find a way of earning a crust

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 20:18

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

They have HRH Prince Charles The Bank Of One's Father.

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 20:23

Posted by: frecky (128)

Total pair of pillocks////

Replied: 9th Nov 2020 at 22:59

Posted by: kathpressey (5240) 

The photo shoot by Harry and Megan in an American cemetery was totallt tacky and tasteless. Why couldn't they have done this privately if it meant so much? why did he need the need to wear his medals for a "private" visit?They are an embarrasment to themselves. Why didn't he send a wreath to his od Barracks? I'm sure they would have placed it appropriately. I think they need us much more than we need them. Without the Royal hoo ha they are nothing/

Replied: 10th Nov 2020 at 08:35

Posted by: basil brush (16183)

Well said, kath.

I'm surprised "some people" have not expressed there disgust at it.

Replied: 10th Nov 2020 at 14:26

Posted by: linma (2645)

Edward and Mrs Simpson all over again.

Replied: 11th Nov 2020 at 08:29

Posted by: jathbee (10724)

I agree with you, Linma.
Except this pair chose exile for themselves. They may make their way living off his royal connection to the Queen, but pale into insignificance in his own country. But hey. It's what they wanted.

Replied: 11th Nov 2020 at 08:45
Last edited by jathbee: 11th Nov 2020 at 18:53:28

Posted by: basil brush (16183)

Might be of interest to "some people"

link

Replied: 14th Dec 2020 at 11:33

Posted by: peter israel (1040) 

All this expertise on Harry and Megan's life again wow !!! well back when this post was started
Was around the time Magan was going thorough her Miscarriage !!! and some of you are still having ago and them ... maybe it is all true and they did leave because of the onslaught from the press / family / public opinion ! who know?? all we know is that they have paid the ultimate price !! losing a child !! maybe from the presser and some of you lot still think you know better

Replied: 15th Dec 2020 at 06:00

Posted by: kathpressey (5240) 

peter isreal - a miscarriage is very sad when it happens to anyone but it has no bearing on Harry and Megan's behavior. What really bugs me at the moment is that Happy has always gone on about his mother being exploted by the media and how this has affected his mental health and yet he has not said one word about how his mother has been portrayed In Crown because he is taking money from Netflix. Hypocrisy.

Replied: 15th Dec 2020 at 08:31

Posted by: peter israel (1040) 

kathpressey
what have we really heard Harry or Megan say ?? Its always by a 3rd party a friend of a friend "next time when you look it the paper take a look"
so when did HE say he was taking money from Netflix??
you will never hear the royal family comment !!!!! and if he did how doe's it help him>> it just feeds the machine [press]

Replied: 15th Dec 2020 at 09:15

Posted by: momac (11327) 

Peter,she had her miscarriage in July,so why announce it at the same time as Kate lost her dog..in November..where was the press when she supposedly went into Hospital and Harry visiting.Why does she preach about love and reaching out to people when she ignores her own family mainly her Dad who paid for her education,and it's time Harry bucked up,thousands of children lost their Mums in terrible circumstances..they speak about pollution throughout the world yet it doesn't matter if they command a jet to fly them to wherever.
Thousands of women have lost their unborn babies myself included..which was a bad miscarriage..I don't remember falling to my feet..I remember having blood and plasma transfusions.
Peter,the next time you see a photo of them both,notice how she will find the camera to smile into...it takes a woman to see through another woman.

Replied: 15th Dec 2020 at 10:05
Last edited by momac: 15th Dec 2020 at 10:16:35

Posted by: PeterP (8311)

Just glad I don't buy a newspaper (read online) has over the last few days there as been pages and pages about themI just scroll past this total crap

Replied: 15th Dec 2020 at 10:48
Last edited by PeterP: 15th Dec 2020 at 15:04:36

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

Leave them to it. They won't spoil my life no matter what they do or say.

Replied: 15th Dec 2020 at 12:21

Posted by: basil brush (16183)

im more bothered about the pubs being open.

Replied: 15th Dec 2020 at 13:27

Posted by: kathpressey (5240) 

peter israel. I agree that I've not heard directly from Harry about how much they are getting from Netflix. but he won't be doing it for free.Nor have I heard his opinion on how his own parents have been portrayed on Crown but he has a lot to say about the British press. Sheer hypocrisy. Nor will they be working for Spotify for free, telling us about kindness and compassion when she has disowned her own father and so prevents Archie knowing his grandad. cashing in on their Royal status that they were so quick to leave for a "private" life.

Replied: 17th Dec 2020 at 08:34

Posted by: broady (16580) 

My word. We are going to get another episode of this sorry saga rammed down our throats night and day for another year or two.

Replied: 14th Feb 2021 at 22:24

Posted by: First Mate (218)

The blessing of another child, what parent could ask for more.

Replied: 14th Feb 2021 at 23:37

Posted by: mrs m (254)

For a couple who supposedly want privacy, they certainly have a strange way of going about it. Our press is reporting Harry and Meghan paid tribute to Diana by announcing a second child on the same day Diana announced she was pregnant with Harry in 1984. I wonder whose idea that was. Theirs or their publicity agent?

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 00:20

Posted by: Stardelta (8005)

80 replies, over 2.5k views and a resurrection?

Yep..... it’s pretty obvious that people in here aren’t interested in them!

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 07:04

Posted by: laughing gravy (6932)

sd off topic but have you been watching allen millyard building his honda six cylinder racebike? excellent watch

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 09:28

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

Talk about damned if they doo, damned if they don't, she marries Harry, and everyone hates her because she is going to have a life of privilege and wealth, etc etc

She is perceived by Royal haters as being a gold digger.

She soon tyres of all the sniping and Royal hating crap, and so she says lets get off the gravy train and show um that we can earn our way in the world, and not be a burden on the British state, so they have a word with the powers that bee, and yon Queen, who says fair enough but yoo will have to bugger off, and doo it somewhere else.

So Harry's home country don't want him, and Megan's home country the US of A doesn't want her back, so they go to Canada who say "we don't want um either, and for a start we are not going to pay for their security" Britain says "oh yes yoo are paying and providing their security, because if yoo don't, our Queen, who is also your Queen, will be displeased, and she will have your heads chopped off, by yon Royal executioner"

They cawn't doo right for dooing wrong

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 10:19

Posted by: gaffer (6627) 

In the early days Philip told Harry nothing good would come from him getting together with Meghan.

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 11:52

Posted by: momac (11327) 

I saw a video where they were approaching a table at some meeting or other,Harry stepped forward and she pushed him back,another video when was supposedly pregnant..but her bump fell down to the bottom of her dress..how on earth did the crowd in front of them not notice that.

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 12:16

Posted by: basil brush (16183)

Posted by: Stardelta (7956)

80 replies, over 2.5k views and a resurrection?

Yep..... it’s pretty obvious that people in here aren’t interested in them!

Well said, SD

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 12:20

Posted by: GOLDEN BEAR (3338) 

THE SOONER WE ABOLISH THE MONACHY THE BETTER WHAT WITH ALL THE LEECHES JUST LAZING AROUND BLEEDING THE TAX PAYER'S OF THEIR HARD EARNED MONEY IS UTTERLY ABSURD IN THE 21 ST CENTURY ,IF IDIOTS OF THIS COUNTRY WANT ALL THAT BALLYHOO WELL JUST HAVE ONE KING/QUEEN AND LEAVE IT THAT ,THE SAVINGS COULD GO INTO THE N.H.S. FOR EXAMPLE .

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 13:32

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 14:08

Posted by: First Mate (218)

It was estimated in 2017 the Monarchy generated a gross uplift of £1.766 billion to the uk economy.

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 14:24

Posted by: broady (16580) 

No one disputes that. I have expressed my admiration for the Queen many times on here. Harry and Meghan decided,as is their right, to leave that circle and move to the USA. Now they use what should be a private family moment to decide they want to be back in the headlines and no doubt make a few bob in the process. Hypocrites.

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 14:58

Posted by: Stardelta (8005)

Started by: broady (16530) View broady's page
Is anyone really interested in their opinions or lives?

Started: 30th Jun 2020 at 05:20

For someone who claims not to be interested in their affairs.......it seems YOU certainly are!

Hypocrites indeed

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 17:32

Posted by: broady (16580) 

Have you nothing better to do with your time? A quick question for you. Have you ever started a thread on here or do you and the Village Idiot just loiter until you can spout your opinion, which almost inevitably , is acting as the Devils Advocate.

PS Putting you back on ignore. ???????????? More to do than have the craic with a pot hole filler.

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 17:40

Posted by: Stardelta (8005)

You will NEVER cease to amuse me Boardy

Replied: 15th Feb 2021 at 18:38

Posted by: 0 years (4366)

Broady makes sense.....again (re the hypocrites).

Personally, I admire the Royal family tremendously, but everyone to their own.

As for the attention seeking actress. She grasped her opportunity to play the role of Princess on the world stage, when she tired of that off she pottered to Neverland with her golden ticket to fame and fortune. Now she is milking it.

The sooner the media over here ignores her the better.

Replied: 16th Feb 2021 at 17:01
Last edited by 0 years: 16th Feb 2021 at 19:10:25

Posted by: tonker (23077) 

I blame the Scottish!

Replied: 16th Feb 2021 at 17:45

Posted by: Stardelta (8005)

The media will never stop ignoring celebs..........instead the people need to start ignoring the media.

Replied: 16th Feb 2021 at 19:13

Posted by: tonker (23077) 

Celebs????

Ah.! You mean, like, Celebs.?

I wouldn't even blame the Scottish for that bloody rhinoceros!

Replied: 16th Feb 2021 at 19:35

Posted by: basil brush (16183)

Replied: 19th Feb 2021 at 12:23

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

I have got a bad feeling about this

I am no marriage guidance councillor, but when a woman gets fed up with a relationship, and the man starts jumping through oops too please her, then the lady woman will crush him under her thumb, and screw him into the ground, and then kick him down't road

Another scenario is that Harry's DNA will be revealed to reveal that he is not Charles's son, but Harry is James Hewitt's son

The powers that bee, may kill off Harry

Replied: 19th Feb 2021 at 13:10

Posted by: chatty (8053) 

"The current royal scandal is not the Queens grandson doing an interview with an American chat show host to talk about his private life but her son refusing to do one with the FBI to address serious allegations against him.
Maybe we should be getting more worked up about that."
Brian Reade in todays Daily Mirror.

Replied: 20th Feb 2021 at 12:11

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

I agree

Replied: 20th Feb 2021 at 12:23

Posted by: broady (16580) 

Spot on Chatty.

Replied: 20th Feb 2021 at 14:29

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

Totally agree with TTS and Chatty.

Under My Thumb

Replied: 20th Feb 2021 at 15:36

Posted by: basil brush (16183)

wasn't there someone else, on here below, who posted northern links???????

Replied: 21st Feb 2021 at 13:23

Posted by: TerryW (6276)

Was there who was it can you name them?

Replied: 21st Feb 2021 at 13:30

Posted by: sergio123 (3)

While I agree Andrew should be charged of any wrong doing ,I dont seem to remember Brian Reade getting wound up by the grooming gang scandal .Maybe I'm being cynical,but was because they were Labour run councils.There is even posters on here agreeing with Reade who seemed to give the grooming gangs a free pass ,because white people do it mmm

Replied: 22nd Feb 2021 at 03:17

Posted by: peter israel (1040) 

just came upon this to day Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's interview now do you see how you get manipulated from the press on what you say or think!!! Like I have said before the only ones who know what is going on is harry and meghan
And the press can say what ever they like because the royals never comment

Replied: 7th Mar 2021 at 07:28
Last edited by peter israel: 7th Mar 2021 at 07:31:45

Posted by: whups (5450) 

so wot r u saying that tory run councils dont have any grooming in their area ? . and yes there is a bit of cynicism in your reply.

Replied: 7th Mar 2021 at 12:46

Posted by: baker boy (15523)

i am not sure harry ever had the slightest control over his wife. my feeling is the longer it ,ie the marriage goes on, the less he wears the trousers.

Replied: 7th Mar 2021 at 14:15

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

The interview is being shown on ITV on Monday night at 9.00pm

I hope it's good after all this hype, it better not be crap

I hope that Meghan confirms that the Queen is in fact a shape shifting, alien reptile from another planet, as per David Icke

.express.co.uk/David-Icke-queen-shape-shifting-lizard

Replied: 7th Mar 2021 at 14:41

Posted by: sergio123 (3)

I only speak English sorry

Replied: 7th Mar 2021 at 17:03

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

Why are you sorry about speaking English

Replied: 7th Mar 2021 at 17:21

Posted by: sergio123 (3)

Because I wish I could speak other languues.Dont you ?I've tried I'm just to thick,can you speak other languages or are you thick too

Replied: 8th Mar 2021 at 03:08

Posted by: First Mate (218)

Posted by: baker boy (15523)
i am not sure harry ever had the slightest control over his wife. my feeling is the longer it ,ie the marriage goes on, the less he wears the trousers.

Replied: 7th Mar 2021 at 14:15
Wears the trousers
to be the person in a relationship who is in control and who makes decisions for both people:
How archaic, Baker boy marriage is a partnership.

Replied: 8th Mar 2021 at 09:34
Last edited by First Mate: 8th Mar 2021 at 09:35:48

Posted by: chatty (8053) 

I hope that Meghan confirms that the Queen is in fact a shape shifting, alien reptile from another planet, as per David Icke

Surely that all fits in with your insistence about little green men from another planet Tommy?

Replied: 8th Mar 2021 at 09:58

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

Chatty

I have never insisted that there are little green men from another planet

Replied: 8th Mar 2021 at 10:12

Posted by: whups (5450) 

no partnership in this marriage she definitly is wearing the pants here . she,s conned the lot of them & took him out of his world & into hers . she is shamelessly exploiting the royal name for her own benefit by making deals with the likes of oprah winfery & netflix .

Replied: 8th Mar 2021 at 11:34

Posted by: chatty (8053) 

My mistake I must of dreamt it Tommy.
Unless it was placed in my mind by an out of this world being whilst I was resting during the night.




PS. Have you also ditched the purple shell suit as well then?

Replied: 8th Mar 2021 at 11:53

Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (6595)

Ditched the purple shell suit about 30yrs ago, and it would not fit me now.

As regards the UFO question, which is now regarded as what is known as UAP (Unexplained Aerial Phenomena) there does seem to be such Phenomena, but what it is, well that is the question, the reports UFO's hovering over nuclear missile sites, and interfering with the operation of those missiles, the interviews done with ex military personnel who witnessed those events is compelling, but there is a lot of crap surrounding the subject, people just jumping on the UFO bandwagon to make a few bob out of it, by making crap documentaries about the subject.

Replied: 8th Mar 2021 at 12:26

 

Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.