Sports (Talk about balls here.)
"City’s viewpoint appears to be that they were being asked to provide evidence that simply did not exist. They were also reluctant to go along with a process which was based on emails which they claim had not only been illegally obtained, but had also been taken out of context. CAS appear to have accepted that, which accounts for the fact they did not quash the fine entirely, but did reduce it substantially. The point they seem to be making is that, while Uefa’s case was based on dodgy material, City really could have been more cooperative with investigators."
However, if clinging onto that little nugget of fiction trumped up to pacify uefa helps you sleep at night then fill your boots Chatty.
Tiger Cat, I think you mean that it is a sad day for you.
And a sad day for you is always a happy day for me!
Replied: 13th Jul 2020 at 17:27