Login   |   Register   |   

People   (Re-unions, trace old friends and relatives.)

Started by: willowandpepper (15)

Hi mrs m

No problem, I am so glad for you that you have found a family connection.

Your right my calculation in reegard of Thomas's age was wrong. He would have been 16 - 17 months old as you say.

I am glad that you think that the age mentioned on the BMD is wrong - I also think that.

So on that assumption I think my Thomas Quick is Sam??

Now I am wondering why he would call himself Sam?

Would you happen to know the names of any local churches were Thomas Quick / Sam may have been buried?

Thank you for any ideas you may have

Kind regards,

Replied: 16th Apr 2023 at 00:29

Report Abuse

Only use this form to report abuse about the post displayed above. If you have a query or wish to make a comment, do not use this form.

Your IP No. (3.128.202.221) will be logged.

* Enter the 5 digit code to the right of the input box. Don't worry if you make a mistake, you will get another chance. Your comments won't be lost.