Interact
Interact


removed thread

Started by: walshy76 (inactive)

thank you to brian or ron or whoever it was who removed the thread "blinkin eck" from the general section

sick low life comments like the ones posted on that thread have no place on a site like this

if someone as to resort to comments like that all because they are not getting there own way then maybe they should go and do it on another site

or even better leave the site

if someone can sink so low it makes you wonder what kind of things he maybe be saying about other people

does he say anything about our hereos because they have ended up less fortunate than others because of there injurys

thing like this are bound to go through peoples minds now that this person has showed exactley how low he will sink when he doesnt get his own way

oh and its not what we first thought so that is good news for me but bad news for this sick person as his sick comments are no longer true

but then again he can always make something up

Started: 28th Oct 2011 at 08:47
Last edited by walshy76: 28th Oct 2011 at 16:06:38

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Wasty

(Pssst...It hasn't been removed.)

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 11:18

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

good, where is it.
I want to read what it says

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 11:22
Last edited by anthony1: 28th Oct 2011 at 11:23:40

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

its been removed off here and a lot of people have read this so they all no what a low life you are for having to resort to sicko comments


thats good enough for me

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 11:37

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Wasty

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 11:38

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

i feel sorry for the soldiers,thats if he sicko does do something for them, having someone like that called helping them

i do hope hes not saying nasty things about them because there less fortunate because they have been injured during the war

makes you wonder

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 11:44

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Wasty

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 11:45

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

i wonder if if could be like that with them because hes jealous because they are heroes who have actually done something and not pretended

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 11:47

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 12:14

Posted by: frances (2831) 

Anthony I think the thread should be Bloomin Heck!!! and that is on handbags

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 12:28

Posted by: mache (inactive)

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 13:01

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

just been and looked. I'm glad it's continuing here on general.

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 13:09

Posted by: nicko (inactive)

I love eggs Me

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 13:16

Posted by: walshy76 (inactive)

just been and looked. I'm glad it's continuing here on general.

not by me,ive showed what a sick person he really his,though i think people had a good idea of that already,i cant understand how a person like that can so call have dealings with people who have been to war,not just talked about it,defended our country,and not just talked about it,and are now sadly less fortunate than ourselves

i wonder if he thinkink,but is not man enough to say it out loud,the same about our heroes

no doubt he will come on and repeat his self,which usually means he as nothing new to say, but thankfully i have not got the muscle wasting problem,like first thought so im happy as ive known this for a while but went along with it because i knew it would only be a matter of time before the sicko brought it up because he wasnt getting is own way so thanks for being so predictable, now everyone knows what your really like

oh there is more but thats for another time

i love it when a plan comes together

i think my work is done here

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 14:54

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Wasty

Mache, the egg on his face went over wasty's head, I'm afraid....
Made me laugh though

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 15:31
Last edited by the_gwim_weaper: 28th Oct 2011 at 15:34:22

Posted by: nicko (inactive)

he's your lover

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 15:34

Posted by: ladyloll (inactive)

Walshy

I often read but very rarely do I comment on these boards unless I feel I can add some comments of value. However I cannot let some of your latest accusations against Gwim go without responding. (I am Gwim's better half btw)

You have made some very strong comments recently about Gwim and soldiers so let me put the record straight. Some 15 months ago my nephew was killed in action in Afghanistan.
Now as well as grieving the loss of a family member of which he has known since a boy, Gwim also has shown his respect time and time over by attending other fallen soldiers repatriations and funeral ceremonies. Now I don't tell you this to defend Gwim (as we all know he is very big and capable!) but he would never divulge such details out of respect for me, my nephew and the soldiers ceremonies he has attended. For you to suggest that he would insult any of our troops is highly offensive to me and other bereaved families.

If you must carry on with your childish games - which are at times admittedly amusing to read can I suggest that you stick with attempting to insult Gwim and not use sensitive topics that can cause distress and offence to others. There are boundaries which should never be crossed and our troops be either serving, KIA or retired are one of those boundaries. To use them as you have done to try and score petty points is despicable and tells people far more about what type of person you are than him.

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 16:14

Posted by: priscus (inactive)

I think you have all got some bloody cheek, when Brian (presumably) bounces it off to handbags, and you ignore his decision and restart handbagging on here!

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 16:24

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

All?
wasty chose to start the thread, a thread directed at, and about, me. This gives me the right to respond.

You have as much a nerve to post on this thread as anyone else, apparently.

(Pssst,you may wish to ask Brian why it's on 'Handbags' in the first place)

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 16:32
Last edited by the_gwim_weaper: 28th Oct 2011 at 17:19:23

Posted by: sonlyme (2811)

I remember when there was no handbag/sport/politics boards.Most things went on general and communicate was far better for it.

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 16:37

Posted by: veg grower (inactive)

Can I just say - when I started the thread Bloomin Heck - it was certainly not in any way meant to cause any trouble.

The 2012 Calendar that I highlighted is titled 'Rugby For Heroes'.

My post was light-hearted but obviously there is a more serious side to the calendar.

I apologise if I have offended anyone - that was never my intention.

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 17:29

Posted by: erontquay (inactive)

VG I think the majority of folk on WW will realise that the thread was light hearted. I for one was not offended in the least, by your post. Bloomin Heck where would we be without our sense of humour eh .

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 17:36

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Hear hear....Worry not, VG. You can see the time and post where the thread went downhill, until then, it was all in good fun.

His work here is done...He just doesn't know it.

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 17:40
Last edited by the_gwim_weaper: 28th Oct 2011 at 17:41:30

Posted by: joseph 1 (inactive)

Thought I'd missed something, but after reading the "Removed Thread" I can see I haven't.I Most certainly agree with Ladyloll's sentiments about our service personnel.

Replied: 28th Oct 2011 at 18:13

Posted by: ©art© (6154)

On a lighter note.
Ladyloll. Lovely pic of you on your profile...tell me, is that gwim alongside you?

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 00:50

Posted by: madamehmurray (6177) 

I trust no one that is my moto

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 03:58

Posted by: nicko (inactive)

moto cross?

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 08:32

Posted by: veg grower (inactive)



I know what you mean Erin

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 08:33

Posted by: anthony1 (inactive)

I remember when there was no handbag/sport/politics boards.Most things went on general and communicate was far better for it.

correct, WW has gone down hill since these so called improvements were introduced.

people can decide for themselves which thread they want to click on

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 11:36

Posted by: fossil (6809)

Yes, unusually I completely agree with Anthony,I think the lack of self moderation disappeared with the addition of the new features!

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 12:13

Posted by: priscus (inactive)

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 14:37

Posted by: dustaf (inactive)

Started: 28th Oct 2011 at 08:47
Last edited by walshy76: 28th Oct 2011 at 16:06:38


An October explanation would be helpful to anyone who may not have seen the original post.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 15:56

Posted by: ladyloll (inactive)

Thank you @Art - tis the soft lighting :-)

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 16:18

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Or the soft head.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 16:31

Posted by: dustaf (inactive)

Another one bites the dust.

Perhaps a thank you is due.


Sort of a 'Removed Removed-Thread thread?

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 16:37

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Lost me there. I requested the other thread removed, Brian obliged. I was happy to let this one ride, allowed him to 'finish his work'.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 16:43

Posted by: dustaf (inactive)

So one has been removed?

I was suggesting a new thread on General to thank whoever for removing (from General) the 'Removed Thread' thread.

ie This one.

But I'd only get myself confused, with no way to google myself right.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 16:54

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Removed from Gen' to Handbags, I meant. Tsk!

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 16:56

Posted by: priscus (inactive)

You could end up in an infinite regress quite soon, dustaf.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 16:57

Posted by: dustaf (inactive)

Indeed.

For the record, I agreed with your comments about wrting on this thread (and Gwims right to reply).

Hence my posting 'post-shunt'.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:00

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Who was the insufferable boar who lived in Thailand and wrote a pretentious book?
He was on WW for a while.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:03

Posted by: mache (inactive)

jezza crazey

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:05

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

lol....The very man (ish)

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:07

Posted by: dustaf (inactive)

Elements Of Nature

Possibly 'Vanity Published.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:23

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Heavens to murgatroyd.. I miss his ramblings.

Or do I?...YOU DECIIIIIDE!

(Pssst...I must confess, I read his book from cover to cover, just never opened it)

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:26
Last edited by the_gwim_weaper: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:28:53

Posted by: dustaf (inactive)

AuthorHouse

Vanity Publishing

Good luck to him anyroad. Hope he sold plenty.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:29

Posted by: the_gwim_weaper (inactive)

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:50

Posted by: dustaf (inactive)



That's very naughty.

But funny.

Replied: 29th Oct 2011 at 17:52

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 

I liked Jerry,he totally wound Broady up with his posts.

Replied: 30th Oct 2011 at 19:30

Posted by: broady (16694) 

Something that you don't seem to be able to do these days. This is the longest I have EVER kept a New Year's resolution by the way.

Replied: 1st Nov 2011 at 21:29

Posted by: jay_1 (14715) 



Ah i like you Broady.

I'll try harder next year.

Replied: 1st Nov 2011 at 21:40

 

Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.