Sportswashers wanting the beast to give

Started by: chatty (8636) 

evidence in attempt to dodge paying compensation:


"Delivering a cutting opening, James Counsell QC, representing the men, said that City 'now bases its defence full square on information it has received from one of Britain's most notorious paedophiles'."

Is there any depths they wont stoop to avoid doing the right thing.

Started: 25th Oct 2021 at 20:32

Posted by: Don GB (510)

Judging from the title, I assume that you are trying to deflect attention away from the team you watch on T.V.'s pathetic humiliation against Liverpool.

Face it, your team is garbage and no amount of sh** flinging will alter that fact.

Replied: 25th Oct 2021 at 21:43
Last edited by Don GB : 25th Oct 2021 at 21:45:37

Posted by: whups (7568) 

so your saying bennall was,nt a paedo then ? .

Replied: 25th Oct 2021 at 23:46

Posted by: chatty (8636) 

For someone who has me on "ignore" (yea right ] you don't half struggle to erm ignore me.
You usually have to sit and wait for somebody to comment on my post then comment on theirs to make out you haven't seen mine.
Have you given up the pretence all together now then?

Anyhow back on topic, I dont make the news all I have done is post a link.
This is from the BBC website posted yesterday (now) 25/10/2021.
So even though it is an historic case the news of City calling him as a witness came out yesterday so nothing to do with "deflecting tactics" in fact you have now used "deflecting tactics" by inferring I have posted it to shift attention away from a football game!!!
So I take it then you've nothing to say about the developments......oh hold on I've forgot you wont see this post because yip......."you've got me on ignore"

Having just thought about it, may be it's the Sportswashers who are the biggest deflectors of all, strange the news leaked out on the day the news was all about their more successful neighbours bad result.

Replied: 26th Oct 2021 at 07:16
Last edited by chatty: 26th Oct 2021 at 08:11:53

Posted by: neverstill (inactive)

Are you still buying petrol chatty? A simple yes or no will do or are you too embarrassed to admit you help fund the murderous regime you claim to hate! I won't expect an answer as your a hypocrite of the highest order.

Replied: 26th Oct 2021 at 09:39

Posted by: chatty (8636) 

Don't be rude, stop pushing in.
There is a que for people to ask questions and one for people to answer, you are at the front of the que to answer and at the back to ask.
So once again who's you team then???
You've been asked for many weeks by plenty people so don't be shy?
But seeing that I am a generous soul I will answer your question anyway, I honestly don't own anything that uses petrol.

Replied: 26th Oct 2021 at 10:11

Posted by: neverstill (inactive)

Oh so you never have either I suppose! I take it you had a electric car for the last 30 years or was you a milkman lol

Replied: 26th Oct 2021 at 10:25

Posted by: chatty (8636) 

Who mentioned 30 years
The sportswashers have been doing their laundry at City for just over 10..
Anyway yet another question of yours I have answered, and yet you can't bring yourself to answer a little old one.

Replied: 26th Oct 2021 at 11:41

Posted by: Don GB (510)

No matter how much you try to deflect the attention away from trafford's failings, the fact is that the whole world witnessed the monumental humiliation on Sunday.

Their continuing slide into mediocrity is there for all to see.

Never mind though, just keep slagging off THE CHAMPIONS in the hope that nobody notices.

Replied: 26th Oct 2021 at 12:43
Last edited by Don GB : 26th Oct 2021 at 12:48:28

Posted by: chatty (8636) 

So more deflection from the thread subject then!

Replied: 26th Oct 2021 at 12:47


Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.