JJ
Why muddy an issue with two posts of exactly the same subject name ????? Do you seek confusion ?
Started: 6th May 2007 at 20:30
Optimus JJ asked on one post good things
and on the other post bad things so not both the same!!!!
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 20:36
Haz, I was refering to post SUBJECT. Both identical
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 20:38
Well I suppose so if you put it like that.
optimus.
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 20:41
I put it like that in the first post
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 20:45
but I always thought there was a difference between good and bad.
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 20:58
sheesh, is it ME being stupid ??? Subject name, Subject name Haz
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 21:00
It could just be me and my little glass of wine getting in the way...eh!
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 21:15
LMAO, allowed. (Dont tell anyone, im having a Brandy 
)
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 21:22
I think I'm having a bit of wine.
(Medium white is preference)
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 21:41
Optimus
The reason was to seek clarity between the good comments, and bad comments on separate lists so as not "to muddy the water" like if you have a good thing to say then thread number 1list a bad post is for number 2 list
not a good thing to mix oranges with lemons LOL
JJ
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 22:33
sheesh, punctuation JJ, punctuation !
Replied: 6th May 2007 at 22:42
g/day opt.
Replied: 7th May 2007 at 09:37
 |
|