What do you all think

about jarvo having access to your details, e mail address, etc?

He is only winding you up.

If he is indeed to be our new leader I'd like to make it clear that unless I get to sing I Will Survive in my pink off the shoulder number in that dreadful dive he frequents then I shall resign

I may pop in to see that, Walter.

Posted by: dodger (2826) [2,500+] Report abuse

He is only winding you up.

Replied: 5th Nov 2015 at 19:19


We all know he's as thick as thieves with Ron, Dodger.

Walter, you also have to dance round yer handbag!

Dodger, save me a seat, I'll come home specially for the performance!

Yes, but Ron isn't the owner.
it is a wind up.

Dodger, I agree it's a wind up, best to ignore it

Ron has access to all our info, Dodger,owner or not.

he couldn't lead a blind bat round on a leash that one....

I know Ron has access to all our info, but he would not give that info to Jarvo, or anyone else for that matter,
The only way Jarvo can get access to our information, is by being made a mod.
If Brian made Jarvo a mod there would be no members left on here, he would ban the majority of them.

If Jarvo's made a moderator,

I'm out!

If Wolves have a bad day we are all out

dodger... Do you think he would need to bother banning anyone? All gone without any persuasion within seconds.

Good point well made (as usual from you Anne)

Anne

No hopes for me then

Just reading the above would a more simple solution not be to get rid of Jarvo???

From your lips to gods ears broady

Well me being "Mrs Mac" I dont stand a chance Tara its been nice knowing you all. Just kidding I'll wait for the chop. He keeps saying it wont be long

Posted by: broady (9134) [View broady's page] [7,500+] [View blog] Report abuse

Just reading the above would a more simple solution not be to get rid of Jarvo???

Replied: 5th Nov 2015 at 20:1



Been done before broady, BUT someone let him back on.

Makes you wonder, doesn't it.

Well I never.

Talk about scaremongering

Have you got nothing else better to do?!!

Get a grip!! And, a shovel full of salt

Any moderator, of any forum, has users email details.

Is there a problem with that?

Or is it just, you don't like the (alleged) moderator

As far as I'm aware, Jarvo is just a member. Just like the rest of us. Myself included

granada the point being made by this thread is that he is intimating that he is more than just a member and has access to member information..

Members do have a right to know if another member has access to their personal info without their permission..

Well, Gemfree.

IF he is a moderator, (which I doubt ) he has access .

What would be the problem there?

Surely when you join a forum you have got to supply your email details.

personally my opinion is he has jack, but some people do not want him to have access to their details. He was not a mod when they joined and I doubt he is now...just his purile mentality....

Gemfree. I like you on here.

However,Don't judge a book. Take it with a Shovel of salt.

In my opinion, for what its worth. Its the messenger who people have a problem with. Not, the message.

Who are these "some people"?

That rings a bell
Take care

The government being able to view your internet files - well its just another victory for IS et al.

Data Protection Act:

Everyone responsible for using data has to follow strict rules called ‘data protection principles’. They must make sure the information is:

used fairly and lawfully
used for limited, specifically stated purposes
used in a way that is adequate, relevant and not excessive
accurate
kept for no longer than is absolutely necessary
handled according to people’s data protection rights
kept safe and secure
not transferred outside the European Economic Area without adequate protection

Post Snowden - do you REALLY believe that. Do you really trust these people who will use any reason, real or imagined, to curtail your rights. What planet are you on or from?

It was NOT A REPLY TO YOU!

If Jarvo is intimidating people with information that he claims ha has access to, then it would appear that this site is in breach of the Data Protection Act.

Tiz you who has shot off at a tangent with comment that is off the topic of the thread.

And your abusive remarks are uncalled foor.

My apologies old sport - this is an important issue and should not be treated lightly. However, it does not condone my bad manners.

I am glad we are not falling out, because, as it happens I am in agreement with the point you are making.

Granada....

several large wheelbarrows would be required......

...I have no access to anyone's personal details...

What an absurd accusation.

However, I do know who'll be gone by the new year...

Jarvo not intimidating anyone, it's just another of the "rejects" stirring things and trying to cause trouble.

Read the above post by Jarvo Basil!

If that's not trying to stir and cause trouble then I don't know what is!

Or maybe because you're so good at stirring you just can't see it for yourself!

Look at the heading.

If that's not trying to stir and cause trouble then I don't know what is!

Plagiarism right there!

Posted by: jarvo (24332) Report abuse


...I have no access to anyone's personal details...

What an absurd accusation.

However, I do know who'll be gone by the new year...


Replied: 6th Nov 2015 at 08:45




Name them then 'we' can look back at the members who have gone or not in the new year. Prove yourself to be telling the truth, or are you liar?

Posted by: basil brush (4582) Report abuse

Look at the heading.

If that's not trying to stir and cause trouble then I don't know what is!

Replied: 6th Nov 2015 at 10:25

The heading is:

"What do you all think"

Hardly contentious.

This Jarvo chappie seems a very popular fellow.

Why bring it up when all us decent, non troublemakers, know that he doesn't have access.

It only seem to be the bother causes/rejects who thinks he does.

Roobarb

How do you know that?

Posted by: jarvo (24332) View jarvo's page10,000+ Report abuse

...I have no access to anyone's personal details

So why post on a different thread that he has in the first place or certainly insinuate that he has if the intention wasn't to stir and cause trouble?

Posted by: basil brush (4585) [2,500+] Report abuse


Posted by: jarvo (24332) View jarvo's page10,000+ Report abuse

...I have no access to anyone's personal details

Replied: 6th Nov 2015 at 11:25


You omitted this snippet, Baz:

However, I do know who'll be gone by the new year...

Posted by: dodger (2832)2,500+ Report abuse

He is only winding you up.

Cheers, BB...

Attention seeking as usual.

So, Jarvo has no access to our accounts, BUT, someone has shown him a list of posters to be (how did Ron put it) "removed, made inactive, deactivated, canned, kicked off, the site,".

The next question is who has shown him this list and why?

Storm in an egg cup? Behave J you little tinker!

Posted by: dannyboy1948 (144) Report abuse


Storm in an egg cup? Behave J you little tinker!


Replied: 6th Nov 2015 at 15:24

Be careful DB It wasn't that long ago he was saying anyone
with under 2000 posts should be culled

Posted by: jarvo (24335) Report abuse


I suggest anyone from 2008 with under 2000 posts gets the red card.

That should do it.


Replied: 19th Aug 2015 at 17:53

Look.


jarvis thinking he is the big i am on here is all he has in his life, because in the REAL world he is a no mark know nowt.




Pathetic.

Posted by: jarvo (24335) Report abuse

...I have no access to anyone's personal details...

What an absurd accusation.

However, I do know who'll be gone by the new year...

Replied: 6th Nov 2015 at 08:45

Interesting that the Owner/Administrator/Moderators aren't backing up your claims that you have seen this "list"...

Some members on here are worried and rightly so that you have access to their personal info, due to some of your recent posts..

If this is the case then the site is in breach of Data Protection by divulging said info to you with no ties to the site other than being a member and a "mate" of Ron's....

Now if you like, an FOI request can be put in which will take up huge amounts of the Owner's time, time that could be spent on finalising the new site..

So, it's quite simple Jarvis, all you need to do is provide proof of this "list" or retract all previous comments from you regarding it and make an apology for your scaremongering....

Dannyboy:

Gemfree

Jarvo can't you see the damage you are doing? Your "list" claims have allowed others to question the integrity of the admins and the site. The admins aren't helping the situation by allowing you to keep doing it.

Damage?

Yes damage. Who would want to be a member of a website where the admins discuss memership with their non admin mates? If your list claims are true this has happened. If your list claims are false then you have got away with breaking the rules. By claiming you have seen this list you have knowingly been provoking other members. Who wants to be a member of a site where admins let their mates get away with more than other members? It's no secret that you are mates with one of the admins.

Don't be absurd.

And maybe, if his claims are correct, he had some influence over who stays and who goes. Not looking good is it.

Am I right in thinking that Brian left this site a while ago.

Roy.

No.

Arrow is not absurd. He knows exactly what he is talking about.

still isn't saying though is he...

in bed with a moderator metaphorically speaking, posting that he has info about members and the new site, of which an assumption can be made that the info can only have come from said moderator...

Absurdity in volumes from himself as he obviously thinks he has done nothing wrong in posting that he has this info...

I am deadly serious, either tell the truth or an FOI request will be made on behalf of several WW members and the results published on here.

You do all know that jarvo is loving all this attention don't you ?

If he does have any say (which I doubt) the site will lose a lot of multi posters (no great loss there) and possibly a significany number of genuine posters who have offended The Jarvotollah,The Jarvmeister (me included I hope)

Ergo this section of the site will wither away and him and his chums can all get very bored agreeing with each other and read poems

Who cares ?

Gemfree I totally agree with you, a FOI request would establish who has official access to the data. However anything said unofficially on the old boys network, we would be none the wiser about, unless we can pin down where and who passed that data on.

Personally I think Jarvo is talking out of his a***, it's just a wind up

Why the moderators allow his statements to go unchallenged though is totally beyond me. It certainly shows them in a very poor light

A child of 3 years of age can see this is a wind up

Calm down. In my opinion, There's no need to panic.

I don't know why you are making an issue out of it

Get a grip, and move on

FOI request Heaven forbid.

You really are missing the point aren't you Granada?

Even a child of three could see it.

Not really, lectriclegs.

The way I see it ( its just my opinion ) is that there is a witch hunt on for jarvo, and a sly dig at the moderators on here

For Petes sake even builderboy (jarvo's best mate ) has stated that jarvo has no "clout" on here.

Builderboy comes across as an honest poster. And, I believe every word he types

"Don't be absurd"
Jarvo, for what it is worth I think your "list" claim is complete and utter rubbish, an obvious wind up but a damaging one. Most people know who the administrator is and who the moderator is. The only way you could know about a list and who is on it is if one of them told you. Your claim suggests that the admin team are discussing members with people they shouldn't be. That is a serious claim to make. If I were the admin and the moderator I would be really annoyed with you for so publicly bringing into question my integrity.

That may be your opinion Granada, and you are entitled to it.

The thread is about other peoples opinions as well.

And mine, lectriclegs

Arrow, completely agree. I am sure it's a wind up, but Jarvo is bringing into question the integrity of the moderator and admin.

What he gets out of that, I have no idea.

Yes, and yours , Granada.

(see the edit)

Very sad that someone who I think is quite intelligent has to play such childish games. I am sure he is more than capable of intelligent conversation but seems to revel in being controversial.

'Several WW posters'?

Does that include all seventeen of yourself, Gemfree?

You are the biggest hypocrite on here, hiding behind your anonymity year after year, posting allegations and futile silly comments. There are others including the Ince clown Joseph, who continues to haunt these boards with vitriol and contempt...

People in glasshouses, indeed.

wow that took you an awfully long time to write....

One username, that the site fully allows me to use, no requirement to use real name and certainly no reason to do just because YOU think people should...

no M58 crusades to go on?

Gemfree, ignore him, he's just after your attention

I know Jazzy isn't it pitiful how he waits and waits for me to post....... :D

He loves you really Gemfree, he just can't handle the rejection

Many a true word said in jest

...I always thought it was tongue in cheek with me and Gemmers...

Don't rain on my parade. None of yers!

What parade would that be?

God! You again...

...I'm glad that this thread took a turn for the better.

I knew it would, eventually.

But will that happen to Wolves??? I very much doubt it.

'Sport' please.

Sorry to change topics. I know it is frowned upon on these boards.

Posted by: jarvo (24353) Report abuse

...I always thought it was tongue in cheek with me and Gemmers...

Don't rain on my parade. None of yers!

Replied: 7th Nov 2015 at 18:36


Bullying the ladies now, Jarvis?

Just about your level that.




Posted by: jarvo (24353) [View jarvo's page] [10,000+] Report abuse

...I'm glad that this thread took a turn for the better.

I knew it would, eventually.

Replied: 7th Nov 2015 at 18:48


Don't count on it.

I mean to get to the bottom of where you are getting you're information from.

post what you want, where you want Broady....

gemfree,
I mustn't upset the possessor of THE LIST.

Posted by: jarvo (24354) Report abuse


'Several WW posters'?

Does that include all seventeen of yourself, Gemfree?

You are the biggest hypocrite on here, hiding behind your anonymity year after year, posting allegations and futile silly comments. There are others including the Ince clown Joseph, who continues to haunt these boards with vitriol and contempt...

People in glasshouses, indeed.


Replied: 7th Nov 2015 at 06:54

How do you know that anyone is a double poster? Joseph certainly doesn't post on WW. He asked the Admin to make him inactive. So you can cross him of your [yet another] list

...And then Mrs Mac arrives and the tone takes a nasty turn...

Lighten up!

I sent myself this message after I had made the 19.03

How predictable Jarvo


From eront To eront, Today at 19:05

I expect another insult from Jarvo

Psst you didn't answer my 10.35 yesterday

Eront he seems to think it's all a big joke...

Tongue in cheek? Dunno where he gets that from....but I also mean to get to the bottom of this...

Good for you Gemfree, if you need any support, there's loads on here that agree with you.

I bet Scotland Yard and the Special Branch will be cancelling all leave then! So they can solve this case

Granada it's a good job I like you

Thanks, Gemfree.

You are a good sport

Nothing wrong with Jarvo at least he doesn't go around threatening people like some of the cavemen on here, you know who you are

Yes he has.

nothing wrong with him that a total person transplant wouldn't put right..

...You don't even know me...

What a ridiculous remark...

I believe mal75

He seems to have you sussed out.

...Yes, the guy who insulted the memory of my mother only yesterday on this very website.

And then tried to make a joke of it.

Didn't he speak to you in a pub and you denied it was you that posted on here?

I speak to loads of folk. I do remember one bloke. He had terrible bad breath...It could have been him.

Well said bluesfan.

I am entitled to my opinion, Nancy.

Maybe you should listen to Tom a bit more.

I'll have a word; maybe we can let him back in.

Maybe.

Replied: 29th May 2016 at 15:24




Still professing to have links with the admin?

...Wait and see.

How long do we have to wait?

Not long, he'll be getting his collar felt soon.

...Another threat, Nancy?

What's threatening about it, mardarse?

Does iccle John not like getting a taste of his own venom?

Have we met before?

Surely, not Sally?

just don;t let him get qt you

Oops, wrong thread.

HE IS GOING TO SAY (TYPE) IT WAS A WIND UP AND EVERYONE WAS FOOLED. BUT IT WAS A BOAST BASED ON A LIE.

Vive la difference

LL still causing trouble, people like you aren't welcome on Wigans no1 premier site.

Didn't another boring poster use to post "oops wrong thread"

"people like you aren't welcome on Wigans no1 premier site"

Under whose authority?

That didn't take long.

Thanks for the bump,Baz.

Here they come.

All for one.

basil

Have you sorted your love life out

Stick to sorting the towns roads out.

Nosey Parker

Baz, if you agree with him or not, Leccy is a good interesting poster, and on most subjects witty with it.

There are subjects, like who has access to our data, that are not appropriate for humour. But they are important subjects for members.

If Rhubarb (aka slap head) doesn't have the information he claims to have, he should withdraw his comments. Those comments bring into dispute the integrity of the moderator and the site.

not to mention the integrity of the site owner Jazzy...potential breach of the Data Protection Act there...

That's up to him, nowt do with me, LL is just one of the cowardly gang that goes around hounding decent posters, like me.

Wind your neck in you soft bugger!

awww diddums....

Gemfree

Didums, why because I spoke the truth, it's obvious it's upset some folk.

it's not about upsetting some folk as you put it, it's about breaking the law...

Well take it up with him...... Not me.

but you are him......

Hahahaha.

Classic, hahaha.

Posted by: basil brush (6310)5,000+ Report abuse

That's up to him, nowt do with me, LL is just one of the cowardly gang that goes around hounding decent posters, like me.

Replied: 1st Jun 2016 at 11:47

Here's what I think

LL is a decent poster unlike "some people" He asked a pertinent question. It deserves an answer

Well you would say that seeing as your both part of the "rejects" gang.

Just giving my opinion, WR admin, if that's OK with you.

love it! "Gang" how old are you 5 or 7?

To put the record straight unless you post your email address NO ONE( except the people who run the site) has access to anyone's email address.

love it! "Gang" how old are you 5 or 7?

Replied: 1st Jun 2016 at 14:38

Are you talking to me or jarvo.



Thanks for that, Ron, hopefully "some people " will stop attacking other members now.and spoiling the site.

Obviously the next question has to be. Does Jarvo play any part in the running of the site??

and the 3rd question is, does he have access to a list of members who will apparently not be allowed to join the new site...

Over to you Ron....

AND THERE WE HAVE IT, ONE BIG FAT LIAR..........

He gives the impression he does broady gemfree I agree with Arrows posts.
Posted by: arrow (555)500+ Report abuse

Jarvo can't you see the damage you are doing? Your "list" claims have allowed others to question the integrity of the admins and the site. The admins aren't helping the situation by allowing you to keep doing it.

Replied: 6th Nov 2015 at 17:39

arrow (555)500+ Report abuse


Posted by: arrow (555)

Yes damage. Who would want to be a member of a website where the admins discuss memership with their non admin mates? If your list claims are true this has happened. If your list claims are false then you have got away with breaking the rules. By claiming you have seen this list you have knowingly been provoking other members. Who wants to be a member of a site where admins let their mates get away with more than other members? It's no secret that you are mates with one of the admins.

Replied: 6th Nov 2015 at 17:54

"Don't be absurd"
Jarvo, for what it is worth I think your "list" claim is complete and utter rubbish, an obvious wind up but a damaging one. Most people know who the administrator is and who the moderator is. The only way you could know about a list and who is on it is if one of them told you. Your claim suggests that the admin team are discussing members with people they shouldn't be. That is a serious claim to make. If I were the admin and the moderator I would be really annoyed with you for so publicly bringing into question my integrity.

Replied: 6th Nov 2015 at 20:26

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Agree with you all. And have to ask why has this thread been rumbling along since 5 November 2015 with no official response until today?

And if Jarvo does not play any part in running the site, why has he been allowed to intimate that he does? And all those posts are still standing?

Jarvo has no connection with the site. He is a member and that's it. I've now locked the topic as it appears to be bothering some people.