Wigan Album
Kathleen Winstanley
11 CommentsPhoto: RON HUNT
Item #: 30609
When women looked like women. Beautiful.
Not a tattoo in sight... I wonder what the young girls of today think when they see photographs like this???Probably the feminists will say that they were exploited...
Maybe they had hidden tattoos possibly tramp stamps on their lower backs, you just never know with these vain contest types.
Joseph I bet a 1000 to 1 they don't
Joseph,would'nt say no having a peep to find out. ( But sure your wrong).
Years ago 1950s-60s if you went for a job showing tattoos, you'd find it hard to get a job, only fairground men and people in jail had them. I know times have changed, but their not for me. These ladies would not have any tattoos, not even a small butterfly on their back...they don't need, their beautiful face and body do the talking for them.
Wiganer: Be careful with the betting odds, you could just be drawn in, it was reported a while ago that Kathleen did have a Tattoo just above her right knee, and if you look carefully at the picture it may tell its own story.
No tattoo, it's a plaster.
I agree with the vain female comment, silly fillies nice to look at and touch but don't ask them to do any housework or get a job because they'll run a mile to the nearest sugar daddy or daft middle aged men like the ones who have commented here who drool like schoolboys to pay their way through life.
so you have to be a plain Jane to get a job or do housework!! What twaddle.
mariene put your claws away, didnt kath winstanley marry and have kids ,she must have managed the household well enough.