Login   |   Register   |   

Sicko's

Started by: zoe24 (2272) 

Just seen in the news a 66yr old man had been found murdered yesterday morning in higher ince, not far from were i live, it makes me sick, someone attacking a defencless man, says he was only going out to fish, hope the people/person who did it gets caught quick n spends the rest of his life in prison, symperthies go out to his family and friends, says he was a well known man round ince.

Started: 1st May 2007 at 17:04

Posted by: optimus (1868)

"rest of his life in prison"

Another case for the death sentence !

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 17:08

Posted by: zoe24 (2272) 

yea, just a pity that wont happen, prob wont even spend rest of his life in prison, be out in a few years and thats if hes caught.

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 17:10

Posted by: dizzy blonde (2132)

Wonder if we had a proper poll in this country regarding the death penalty, just how many would vote for it? Different governments keep telling me I voted against it. When? No-one asked me that specific question so how could I vote against it?

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 18:26

Posted by: doclatino (259) 

I think,DB, that since Capital Punishment was abolished - M.P's have a 'free vote' in Parliament - meaning, they don't have to ask you. Thing is, once somethings been abolished, it's always that much harder to bring it back.
A survey found that the majority of people would vote FOR it - not that it would be much use now DB - what with 'Human Rights' an' all...

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 19:25

Posted by: copperhead (1415) 

An MP does not have to ask you the constituant anything on any matter except will you vote for me. Doclatino is correct in that MP's have a free vote on this subject but that only means that they are free of any Party constrictions.

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 19:37

Posted by: dizzy blonde (2132)

Understand, doclatino & copperhead, but aren't they (MPs.) supposed to do OUR (their constituents) bidding? Is it any wonder no-one bothers to vote these days?

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 19:44

Posted by: hazmarcon (236)

I am all for bringing back Capital punishment. If he/she spends the rest of his/her life in prison who is paying to keep them. (we are) Anyone who murders should be put down!! or am I wrong saying this.

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 19:52
Last edited by hazmarcon: 1st May 2007 at 21:47:26

Posted by: dizzy blonde (2132)

Not at all, hazmarcon. Apparently, we're still a democratic country but crime's getting out of hand and the criminals know it. Hence the tax payers get booted in the face to keep them alive in their little cells.

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 20:05

Posted by: exwiganer (17)

I actually think that capital punsihment is no deterrent. I live in Califronia. We have the electic chair, but everyday when you read the paper there are at least a couple of grisly murders. When these vermin are sentenced to death, they then spend the next 15 years on death row with public defenders fighting for their stay of execution. Personally the idea of someone spending day after mindnumbing day in a prison, gives me much more satisfaction. Also there are several cases brought to the attention of the public every few year where the wrong person has been put to death. Unless there is D.N.A evidence you can never be 100% sure that the person you're killing is the guilty one

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 21:38

Posted by: dizzy blonde (2132)

exwiganer - why does it take so long to get rid of these folk?

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 21:47

Posted by: goldn1 (255) 

me and mi mate(silver1) knew of him, well she knew him a bit better he helped her with her car other week it very sad my thoughts go out to his family n friends.

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 22:33

Posted by: ozzielass (1742) 

I wouldn't support the death penalty - their are too many mistaken identity cases - said this before, can't remember the exact details but a very famous case in the UK where I think 5 innocent Irishmen were stitched up and spent about 20 yrs in prison for something that was later proved they didn't do?? If the death penalty was an option they would have been long gone? They are probably hundreds more like that from before DNA testing.

Here in Australia a freak ran amok a few years ago with automatic weapons at a tourist attraction in Tasmania, and shot dead about 35 people. He, Martin Bryant, a young fella, got life and has tried to kill himself on more than one occasion. Let him suffer every day of his life thinking about the beautiful lives he destroyed.

Replied: 1st May 2007 at 23:09

Posted by: mollie m (7076) 

Ozzielass. People like that don't have a conscience. I believe in a punishment to fit the crime - not necessarily the death penalty. They should start off by chopping one hand off then, if they do it again, chop off a foot. If they don't learn after that, wrap barbed wire round their dangly bits, hook 'em up on a fence, birch 'em, then give 'em to the family of the victim. Better still, give 'em to the wimmin.

Replied: 2nd May 2007 at 00:19

Posted by: keno (2840) 

Ho Mollie do you realy mean that,sounds a bit bizzare.Life sentence for murder,gives the offender the rest of their lives behind bars to think about what they did.In the U S where most States have death penalty has not stopped people being murdered.

Replied: 2nd May 2007 at 02:09
Last edited by keno: 2nd May 2007 at 06:39:26

Posted by: billy (26053) 

mollie old friend, are you one of them?ya know, those we cant mention by name because its classed as discrimatory???well are ya??ps i agree with ya.i agree with your sentiments too d-b, but as you are aware, there isnt any punitive sentenses left in the uk. i watched some brits sent to a yank jail the other night. a stropy bunch they were, and what they werent going to do with the PUSSY yanks...oh what a diff story when they arrived. they were scared sh*****s. none of the mamby pamby treatment of the brit jails, just hard time, and i mean hard in every sense, right down to each one being selected for a few nights of passion with some of the real hard case lifers in there.

Replied: 2nd May 2007 at 09:20

Posted by: billy (26053) 

hanging was a detriment..they voted it out(who did)so what detriment are we left with
(1)tv set in all cells.

(2)cell phones
(3)plentifull suply of hard drugs.
(4)human rights(warders to address scum as MR)just a few of the goodies awaiting the hoods. make this comparison with jail time USa.no comparison.thugs in this country cant wait to be caught, it allows them a well earned rest from us annoying victims.














92
0 cell phones

Replied: 2nd May 2007 at 10:01

Posted by: mollie m (7076) 

The point I was making was that a jail sentence, no matter how long for, is not a deterrent because prisons are far too cosy in this country. They have more privileges than they should have. My partner was recently working in Fazackerly Prison and, whilst on the premises, was not allowed to have a smoke. The prisoners could though! I agree with Billy. Give them a hard time, in the truest sense of the word.

Replied: 2nd May 2007 at 10:23

Posted by: billy (26053) 

yeahhhhh.did the crime....pay for the crime...no goodies, no treats, this is the nick.its pay back time ya worthless nothing.
err....MR worthless nothing.

Replied: 2nd May 2007 at 14:46

Posted by: billy (26053) 

hows ya day so far mollie??had the canvassers around yet?

Replied: 2nd May 2007 at 14:47

 

Note: You must login to use this feature.

If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is free.