Corruption abounds

Imagine my surprise, a dishonest councillor!

Derek Hatton, former deputy leader of Liverpool Council, is one of the people arrested.

Corrupt Labour supporting Lousers? I could hardly believe my eyes.

Hence the reason much of Wigan's greenbelt is being sold at below market value.

only thing good comming out of Liverpool is River Mersey.

But, Albion, the River Mersey doesn't come out of Liverpool. It does itself a favour, by flowing past!

Disciples Ken Dodd

"Hence the reason much of Wigan's greenbelt is being sold at below market value."

Which greenbelt is being sold Firefox?

See the land that wss green, no years? There's a clue.

Wigan doesn't have any greenbelt.

Not again...... another one who doesn't understand what the green belt is. I do, I had trouble with planning permission because my property stands on green belt.

Green land, Annie.. No buildings on it. Is that clearer?

No, it is NOT the correct definition. Green belt is a defined area with specific building and other regulations. Look it up before replying with condescending posts.

Anne's Green Belt!

Annie, the land the council are selling cheaply is land not currently built on. The land is green
. www.wigan.gov.uk › GMSFPDF
The case for releasing Green Belt land in Wigan for new ...

Now then annie.are you OK?
Are you OK, annie?

They're Corrupt !

They all are.

Greenbelt is to stop two towns joining together, problem is some greenbelt can be miles wide, so some of it can be built on, our house is on greenbelt but it was there before the greenbelt rule.

"our house is on greenbelt but it was there before the greenbelt rule."

Maniac!

I meant ghreen land, but the phone changed the wording, No matter, the councillors are corruptm,, and selling off land for their own financial gain.
GREEN BELT LAND, ANNIE!

"See the land that wss green, no years? There's a clue."

No need to get uppity Firefox I was genuinely interested in which greenbelt land was being sold off.

However, if you were just shooting from the lip and making unsubstantiated claims that you hadn't bothered to check whether factual I can understand if you tried to avoid answering the question by being unnecessarily sarcastic.

Greenbelt

"shooting from the lip"
Did you hear anything, no years?

See 5th Dec 2020 at 16:55

Tip for firefox.
Ask him a few difficult questions and he'll put you on 'ignore'( yea right) and then you can post what you like to him, he looks at it but because he's got you on 'ignore" he's give up his right to reply

Hahaha, I did notice.


I shall 'humour' him, as he appears bereft of googling skills

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/wigan-green-belt-development-criticism-15670640

*WARNING. The previous link shows pics of a hideous nature

There, well done.

Now that wasn't too difficult was it Firefox?

Even for you!

I already posted it as previously typed (Not said).

There, not too difficult, was it.

Psst, you forgot the comma before my username...again

Got you, fair play, apparently it was.

As it was a bit garbled (.>) I didn't bother copying as I assumed it wasn't correct (it isn't a link).

. www.wigan.gov.uk › GMSFPDF

BTW, why would I need for a comma in front of your username?

No answer to the comma question then?

Presumably because you were wrong........again.

Yeah.

He's correct. You missed out a comma. However, the comma wouldn't be before his username, it would be behind the previous word.

ie: "Now that wasn't too difficult was it, Firefox"?

"He's correct. You missed out a comma. However, the comma wouldn't be before his username, it would be behind the previous word."

No I didn't, if I had intended to pause before his name then you would have been correct. However I didn't.

If there was any comma required anywhere it would have been after the word "difficult".

ie "Now that wasn't too difficult, was it Firefox"?

Desperado's abound.

ie "Now that wasn't too difficult, was it, Firefox"?

Quite Firefox.

Is anyone like me and finds that as we get older the simplest points of grammar and structuring seem to be less and less obvious to us? (not that it really matters anyway)

I also find that with the simplest of words that in years gone by I wouldn't have even had to think about how they are spelt/spelled but now don't seem right until I put them down on paper/computer, and sometimes not even then.

No doubt it's an age thing.

It depends if you are addressing Firefox, directly.

"Now, that wasn't too difficult". "Was it Firefox?"

As this is a public forum, may I suggest that you were addressing all possible readers.
In that case, it should have been, "Now, that wasn't too difficult was it, Firefox"?

But I wasn't addressing all possible readers, I was addressing Firefox.

Plus I had no need to use two sentences.

Your version below could prompt the answer, " No, it wasn't Firefox", as in, it wasn't him. In that case I would have been addressing the readership at large.

"Now, that wasn't too difficult". "Was it Firefox?"

Was it firefox
No, it wasn't!

Maybe there should be commas after each chuckle face Firefox, unless it was one long barrel laugh.

I think 0 Years is Mac!

Everyone is Mac. unless they aren't funny?
,,,,.

One thing I am is a bit naiive with regards to the identities of posters.

Do you reckon there are many posters who have returned under a different name?

I've always been 0 years.

Who do you think are current posters who used to be known differently?

I know it is widely believed that LG was Kellysdad (with or without the comma).

You aren't funny, are you Mac?

Very good Firefox...........not

*Very good firefox, not*,

Nah, it was more of a suspension for effect rather than a slight pause.

Odd looking speech marks you've put there.

Anyway, it's all a bit boring now. Goodnight, good bantering with you.

It's all rather childish really. You all need to get out more, boys.

Edited for Platty to ensure his confusion is corrected.

It's green Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it,not as we know it. It;s green, Jim not as we know it, not as we know it, Jim.

"Banter".

Nothing new about corrupt councilors, no matter where they are from.
And it abounds everywhere and within most organisations, political or otherwise.
Just glad when they are caught with their dirty mitts in the cookie jar.

No surprise to me that Hatton may be involved.

Nor me, all councillors should be scrutinised when any deal is done and their names are involved..

More than half a million pounds seized from suspects is currently being held by Merseyside Police. It was recovered in five different currencies - Sterling, Euros, Swiss Francs, UAE Dirhams and US Dollars.

Shocking.

"It's all rather childish really. You all need to get out more boys."

Yes it is.

If it offends you, don't read it.

Simple.

I know it is widely believed that LG was Kellysdad

0years i can assure he is but you already know that

Jathbee. It is shocking AngelWood saying, "you all need to get out more boys".
There is no comma after 'more'. How many boys are they supposed to get out? I assumed it was an independant clause and was confused when she didn't suggest the further boys anyone should get out.

It's a Commer!

Posted by: 0 years (4234)

"It's all rather childish really. You all need to get out more boys."

Yes it is.

If it offends you, don't read it.

Simple.

Replied: 6th Dec 2020 at 17:01
Last edited by 0 years: 6th Dec 2020 at 17:03:16

It didn't offend me, so I read it. Simple.

There, all's well that ends well.

I wouldn't have slept tonight worrying whether you were offended or not.

Good, you can rest your weary head unworried then.

Rest assured I will.

Is getting the last word in childish enough for you?

no thats reseved for you know who!..

Tonker. Found one with boys exiting. Grammar solved.

Agreed LG, don't worry, he'll be along soon.

Anderson has now 'Stepped aside' following his arrest.

A story