General   (General discussion, talk about anything.)

I don't know who Mrs. Prescott is and I don't really care. However, looking through the big window, I can see that it probably cost less to pay her the 'fuel expenses', which she wasn't entitled to, as an alternative to 'travel expenses', which she probably was entitled to.
It follows that she might have paid back £354 and received a larger sum in retrospect of the expenses she should have claimed in the first place. With interest at the statutory 8%!