Login   |   Register   |   

General   (General discussion, talk about anything.)

Started by: wigvet (3550)

The Claimant was

i) Not issued a written or verbal formal warning, despite requesting one,
ii) Not given the opportunity to have someone with him at his meeting
iii) Not given an explanation regarding his actions.
iv) No appeal was arranged within a few weeks of his sacking

Chadwicks appear to know the law to stop people parking on their property but have little or no grasp of HR law!!

The judge adding the claimant was dismissed summarily in a process that was ‘reprehensible’

Replied: 10th Aug 2017 at 14:15

Report Abuse

Only use this form to report abuse about the post displayed above. If you have a query or wish to make a comment, do not use this form.

Your IP No. (18.118.145.114) will be logged.

* Enter the 5 digit code to the right of the input box. Don't worry if you make a mistake, you will get another chance. Your comments won't be lost.