|
Free Broadband For All
 |
Posted by: PeterP (7219) |
 |
|
Even if it was FREE some people still would not have it  Even with phones more and more APPS are available, I must be a ludite because I use my phone for calls text and on odd occasions photos  There are people in this country who don't have Televisions never mind a computer 
|
|
 |
Posted by: builderboy (2147) |
 |
|
Labour are keeping their most fanciful promises back at present, and will only wheel them out if they look like they are going to be defeated.
We are all going to be given a unicorn, a stable to keep it in, and a large enough garden to plant the money trees we will all be provided with.
|
|
 |
Posted by: Zanzibar Spangles (3816) |
 |
|
If you come to a politics thread, scroll past it as any normal person would.
|
|
 |
Posted by: baker boy (14972) |
 |
|
walshy
its a pity you have little else to do in your life ,but decry posters who have thoughts on this subject.
|
|
 |
Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (3906) |
 |
 |
Actually ............
By 2030 the standard BT phone, will be a broadband only line, a data line, and to make a voice call, it will go via the broadband system, and it is known as a VOIP ~(Voice Over Internet Provider) call.
On top of that BT or should I say 'Open Reach' will be running a fibre optic cable to everyone's house, they have already have connected most of their street cabinets to the fibre optic system, and this will give mega data speeds to all people and businesses
So Corbyn is as usual talking absolute rubbish ...
|
|
 |
Posted by: Zanzibar Spangles (3816) |
 |
|
You have took the time to post 4 times as many as me.
So I must have more time to spend on my life than you
|
|
 |
Posted by: baker boy (14972) |
 |
|
mr corbyn's project does have several drawbacks.
1. not all folk have internet access via phones or pc's.will he be purchasing the required equipment for the needy.
2. more money spent on part nationalising BT which he does not have.
3. more money wasted on a very dubious project.
4. where is the cash coming from ,lo and behold,increased taxes for big corporations.
you have to give it to the man ,he does not lack ideas
however poor these may be.
how long before the big corporations move out of his reach and its left to you know who to foot the bill,the great british public,venezuala here we come.
petrol £1.50 per litre.VAT 25%
|
|
 |
Posted by: baker boy (14972) |
 |
|
the straw man makes any amount of promises,god forbid he ever get's into power.
the nhs is being kicked about like a football ,one side we will give so much,the other side we will give more.
let the nhs get on with its job ,it's not a political pawn.
|
|
 |
Posted by: firefox (134) |
 |
 |
Hope so, The Labour party needs to rebuild from the bottom up, remembering why it was formed, and why it's vital a real Labour party are once again fighting for the common man.
They lost Scotland, that was their nail.
|
|
 |
Posted by: elmos (2772)   |
 |
|
Vote labour all the Tories will do is take things
Away from you,when have working people ever got
Anything from as Tory without a fight.
Vote labour   
|
|
 |
Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (3906) |
 |
 |
gaffer
It is a stupid idea, and I think that Corbyn just wants an excuse to nationalise BT
|
|
 |
Posted by: baker boy (14972) |
 |
|
every nationalised industry fell on its backside why ?
|
|
 |
Posted by: Tommy Two Stroke (3906) |
 |
 |
baker boy:
"every nationalised industry fell on its backside why?"
Over manning
Outrageous Union wage demands
High Wages
Union demarcation disputes
Lack of flexible workforce
Outdated Luddite Union practices
Lack of Modernisation/Automation of facilities
Bad work ethics
Lack of Research & Development
Lack of Market Study
Lack of Forward Business Planning
= Equals
Industry on its bum
|
|
 |
Posted by: firefox (134) |
 |
 |
Why doesn't the Labour party nationalise the water board(s) and suppy free water to all, Water is essential to life, broadband isn't.
Nationalise National grid plans
This ^ ^ ^ would garner more votes from all age groups.
|
|
 |
Posted by: Axcroft (40) |
 |
|
British Broadband Corporation proposal is stupid, ludicrous, beyond belief. Technology moves at warp speed - Rebecca Long Bailey at the helm?
I'm convinced that voters will desert Corbyn and McDonnell (and hopefully our own local MP's), except for younger voters (and maybe we can forgive their naivety, not having experienced socialism) and the dyed in the wool Labour traditionalist.
Nightmare scenario of nationalisation still hangs over us. Let's hope the British public make the right choice.
|
|
 |
Posted by: Salmon & Ball (460)   |
 |
 |
posted by: TerryW (2552) [2,500+] Report abuse
"Just so glad we won't ever have to go back to power cuts and being held to ransom at every turn."
tories implemented the power cuts and the 3 day week
and your television being cut off at 10.30pm every night?
Good old tories.
|
|
 |
Posted by: baker boy (14972) |
 |
|
nationalising all will be impossible,what you have left is taxing the greedy utilities companies whose profits are from monopoly or price fixing .
there i go again ,letting my socialist side surface.
when i say monopoly, i cannot get my water from anyone but rip off united utilities so i am stuck with a whopping great bill.
with regard to energy companies ,you can throw a butterfly net over their supposed independent prices.
|
|
 |
Posted by: TerryW (2594) |
 |
 |
Posted by: Salmon & Ball (407) View Salmon & Ball's page100+ Report abuse
posted by: TerryW (2552) [2,500+] Report abuse
"Just so glad we won't ever have to go back to power cuts and being held to ransom at every turn."
tories implemented the power cuts and the 3 day week
and your television being cut off at 10.30pm every night?
Good old tories.
Why are you implying that I have some affiliation with the Tories by saying "Good old tories"?
I have never voted for them and never will so please stop making assumptions.
|
|
 |
Posted by: Salmon & Ball (460)   |
 |
 |
Posted by: TerryW (2555)
"Why are you implying that I have some affiliation with the Tories by saying "Good old tories"?
"I have never voted for them and never will so please stop making assumptions."
What are you on about 
I did not. And I did not! 
|
|
 |
Posted by: priscus (7558) |
 |
 |
joemaplin:
They, or at least their predecessor, the Post Office Engineering Department, were my first employer when I left school in early 1960's. Even though I ceased to work for them, I always had a soft spot for them, and retained an interest in their circumstances.
In the 1980's, my next door-but-one neighbour was a BT Engineer, whose experience went right back to my time with them. Needless to say, it is a topic we would chat about endlessly.
He too, took early retirement circa 1990, citing dissatisfaction recognisably similar to what you describe.
Shame really. Up until then, I had always considered them to be a good employer.
ps He also sold his BT shares, correctly recognising that they had peaked, and that the company would be unable to sustain what was being expected of it!
|
|
 |
Posted by: priscus (7558) |
 |
 |
Indeed. Even though I did not stay with them, (I had other plans for myself) I did enjoy working for them.
There was a kind of esprit de corps wasn't there. We knew what was wanted of us, and if we were treated right, we would put in a lot of effort to get it.
|
|
 |
Posted by: Axcroft (40) |
 |
|
Apparently, Dianne ran the numbers on this proposal and persuaded Jeremy that the British Broadband Corporation was a sure fire vote winner.
|
|
 |
Posted by: priscus (7558) |
 |
 |
Where I live, local broadband was pitched against a carrier-pigeon in a race......
And it lost to the pigeon.
|
|
 |
Posted by: priscus (7558) |
 |
 |
Source was Beverley
Destination Skegness
Content some MP4 video
About 2/3 of the file had uploaded, by the time pigeon arrived in skeggy with whole file on a memcard attached to its leg!
|
|
 |
Posted by: aussie94 (2300) |
 |
|
Nothing is free someone has to pay . Tell us who JC
|
|
 |
Posted by: priscus (7558) |
 |
 |
Yes, if you look at what people are actually using the internet for, then it is highly questionable whether it is something that should be tax-payer subsidised.
Porn, commerce, on-line bullying, the sort of fight-club you get on WW, ripping-off content in a manner which trounces the intellectual property rights of owners, and data capture to shepherd people into purchasing/voting etc in manner which fulfils someone else's agenda other that your own......
Do we really want our taxes subsidising all of that?
|
|
 |
Posted by: roylew (3100) |
 |
|
In 2030 the internet will be an outdated old hat anyway
|
|
 |
Posted by: baker boy (14972) |
 |
|
chatty
i'm sick of subsidising the bbc,its dying on its feet .
teletext information is going in january 2020,they say go to the i.player or buy a paper ? if your not net oconnected. if it was an horse they would shoot it to put it out its misery.
|
|
 |
|
Note: You must login to post a reply. If you haven't registered, why not join now?. Registration is FREE! |
|
 |
 |
|